RAJAN ROY, RAVI NATH TILHARI
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
1. Heard Sri. Dileep Kumar Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner/review petitioner and learned standing counsel for the opposite parties.
2. This review petition has been filed by the petitioner-respondent in special appeal, seeking a review of the judgment and order dated 19.04.2016 passed by a co-ordinate Bench in Special Appeal (D) No. 147 of 2016.
3. The petitioner with respect to his grievance that he was being treated as Seasonal Collection Amin filed W.P. No. 425 (SS) of 2011 (Shyam Lal vs. State of U.P. and Others) for direction to the opposite parties to treat him as regular Collection Amin w.e.f. 03.07.1986, claiming the benefit of the judgment dated 19.08.2006 passed in W.P. No. 4031 (SS) of 2001 (Pratap Narain Pandey vs. State of U.P. and Others). In Pratap Narain Pandey, this court had quashed the order dated 19.09.2000 impugned therein and had directed the authorities to allow the petitioner of that writ petition to work as Regular Collection Amin since 05th June, 1986 for the purposes of seniority etc, except the salary for the period during which he did not work. The review petitioner was extended the same benefit vide order dated 0
Ajit Kumar Rath vs. State of Orissa
Kunhayammed and Others vs. State of Kerala and Another
Lily Thomas vs. Union of India
M.M. Thomas vs. State of Kerala and Another
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius
Union of India vs. Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd. (2013) 8 SCC 337 : JT (2013) 8 SC 275
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.