YASHWANT VARMA
Ram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Saurabh Kumar who appears for respondent Nos. 5 to 11 and Sri Birendra Pratap Singh learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The petitioner claims to be the bhumidhar over plot No. 961/1. The aforesaid plot is situated in Village Patwadh Tehsil Robertsganj District Sonbhadra and forms part of a belt of land falling south of the Kaimur Range. According to the petitioner the plot admeasures 10 Bighas 9 biswa. The petition challenges an order dated 06 October 2018 passed by the third respondent refusing permission to the petitioner to sell a part of his land holding. That permission was sought by the petitioner who belongs to the Scheduled Castes in light of the provisions made in Section 98 of the U.P. Revenue Code 20061. Section 98 of the Code reads thus:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.