JUDGMENT :

YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

1. Heard Sri. Guru Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri. Amit Verma, learned Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents.

2. The present petition seeks to assail the order dated 19.07.2021 passed by the Respondent no. 3-Additional Collector (Administration), Muzaffarnagar in Case No. 433 of 2020 (Computerized Case No. D2020095500000433, Sitaram vs. State) whereby permission sought by the petitioner under Section 98(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 [the Code 2006] was turned down. The subsequent order dated 16.08.2021 passed by the Respondent no. 2-Additional Commissioner (Administration), Saharanpur Division, Saharanpur in Case No. 1145 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. C202109000001145, Sitaram vs. State of U.P.) in terms of which the revision filed by the petitioner has been rejected is also sought to be challenged.

3. As per the facts set out in the writ petition, the petitioner claims himself to be a recorded tenure holder of Khasra No. 379/2 measuring 0.3280 hectares, recorded in Khata No. 50 situate at Village-Behada Assa, Tehsil Jaansath, Di