AJAY BHANOT
Baburam – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ram Kishore Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3-State and Sri Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.4-Gaon Sabha.
2. By the impugned order dated 22.01.2021 passed by the respondent No.3-Tehsildar (Judicial)/Assistant Collector 1st Class, Tehsil-Narwal, District-Kanpur Nagar rendered in proceedings registered as Suit No.03064 of 2019, Computerized Suit No.T201903410403064 (State of U.P. Vs. Baburam) under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code'), the petitioner was found to be illegal encroachment over the disputed parcels of land. The learned appellate court/Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Kanpur Nagar by the impugned order dated 20.07.2021 agreed with the findings of the learned trial court/Tehsildar (Judicial)/Assistant Collector 1st Class, Tehsil-Narwal, District-Kanpur Nagar, and affirmed its judgment dated 22.01.2021.
3. Sri Ram Kishore Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the ancestors of the petitioner were allotted a residential patta over the disputed parcels of land. The predecessors in int
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.