ALOK MATHUR
Avinash Chandra Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance, Lko – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions have raised common grievance, and hence they have been heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. The petitioners are Allopathic doctors who have served under the State Government and have since retired. They are aggrieved by the Government orders dated 14/7/2020 and 04/09/2020 whereby they have been denied the revised rate of Non-Practicing Allowance on the ground that they have retired prior to the cutoff date 24/08/2009, while doctors similarly placed and who have retired after 24/08/2009 has been entitled to the revised rate of Non-Practicing Allowance, and hence, they assert to have been unreasonably discriminated, and have prayed for setting aside of the said Government orders as well as the recovery orders passed in consequence of the impugned orders.
2. The facts in brief are that the petitioners are retired Allopathic Doctors of the Provincial Medical and Health Services of Government of U.P who have superannuated prior to 24/08/2009. The Government of Uttar Pradesh promulgated the U.P. Government Doctors (Allopathic) Restriction on Private Practice Rules, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as, Rules of
A. Thangal Kunju Musaliar v. M. Venkatachalam Potti
Bakhtawar Trust v. M.D. Narayan
Bansidhar v. State of Rajasthan
D.G. Gose and Co. (Agents) (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala
Goa Foundation v. State of Goa (2016) 6 SCC 602
Govt. of T.N.v.K. Jayaraman[(1997) 9 SCC 606 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 1208
Hari Ram Gupta v. State of U.P.
Haryana Financial Corporation and Another vs Jagdamba Oil Mills and Another (2002) 3 SCC 496
K. C. Arora vs. State of Haryana
M.D. University v. Jahan Singh
M.M. Nagalingam Nadar Sons v. State of Kerala
Madan Mohan Pathak v. Union of India (1978) 2 SCC 50
Mahabir Vegetable Oils (P) Ltd. v. State of Haryana (2006) 3 SCC 620
Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardichan
N.C. Sing-hal vs. Director General
Shree Sidhbali Steels Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Sidhbali Steels case, Shree Sidhbali Steels Ltd. v. State of U.P.
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. V. Yogendra Shrivastava (2010) 12 SCC 538
State of Punjab v. Amar Nath Goyal
State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih
State of Punjab vs Amar Nath Goel (2005) 6 SCC 754
State of Rajasthan v. Amrit Lal Gandhi
State of Rajasthan v. Basant Agrotech (India) Ltd.
State of W.B. v. Kesoram Industries Ltd.
Swaraj Abhiyan v. Union of India
T.N. Electricity Board v. R. Veerasamy
Urban Development Authority v. Sharadkumar Jayanti-kumar Pasawalla
V. Kasturi Vs. Managing Director, State Bank of India, Bombay and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.