NAHEED ARA MOONIS, SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Anshu Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Manish Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashish Agrawal learned counsel for the Respondent-Bank and Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Let Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), District Varanasi be impleaded as Respondent No.3, today itself.
2. The present writ petition has been filed mainly for the following relief:-
3. Having heard learned counsel for parties and perused the record, it transpires, the petitioner is the auction purchaser of a secured asset bearing House No.8/335, Khajuri, Shivpur, District Varanasi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘secured asset’). It was put up for auction by the respondent-Bank under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to the Act) for recovery of its dues against a home loan ad
B. Arvind Kumar v. Govt. of India
Dilip Kumar Singh and another Vs. State of U.P. and others
ITC Limited Vs. Blue Coast Hotels Ltd. & others
Rakesh Kumar Kaushal Vs. State of U.P. and another
Standard Chartered Bank & others Vs. V. Noble Kumar & others
Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Srigdhaa Beverages
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.