SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Suneet Kumar, J.
Rohit Kumar and Others – Petitioners
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
Writ A No. 988, 2654, 7656, 8412, 10222 of 2021, 4462, 4514, 4786, 5199, 5388, 5807, 6145, 8501, 10636, 14110, 14279 of 2020, 5865 of 2020 (e-court)
Decided On : 29-10-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Man Bahadur Singh,H.N. Singh Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Arun Kumar,Ashok Kumar, Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Ram Prakash Shukla,Sanjay Chaturvedi, Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Satish Chandra Yadav, Vikram Bahadur Singh, Yatindra

Point of Law : Executive action to escape wrath of Art. 14 has to be fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory, transparent, non-capricious, unbiased, without favouritism, in pursuit of appointment and equitable treatment.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 and 16 - U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972 - Section 13 - U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981- Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Rule 14 and 17 - Section 23 - Teachers - Issuance of Certificate - Legality and Validity of Government Order - Petitioners have raised challenge to legality and validity of Government Order therein, denies issuance of No-Objection Certificate to working teachers - A further direction has been sought directing respondents to issue NOC to petitioners and to appoint them in district of their choice.

Finding of the Court : Government has not clarified, as to how, selected candidates working as Assistant Teachers are to be adjusted in district of their choice, but on contrary Government Order is in nature of an injunction restraining Board and appointing authority i.e. District Basic Education Officer from issuing NOC - In other words, selection and placement, both part of same recruitment, has been set at naught, insofar, petitioners are concerned - In my opinion Government Order to that extend has exceeded power, authority and jurisdiction conferred upon Government under Act, 1972 and Rules Executive action to escape wrath of Art. 14 has to be fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory, transparent, non-capricious, unbiased, without favouritism, in pursuit of appointment and equitable treatment - Respondents are directed to issue NOC to all petitioners recommended by Selection Committee - All those Petitioners prohibited, in view of Government Order from participating in counselling, shall appear for counselling on date to be notified by Board - Petitioners shall be given appointment and placement of district strictly in accordance with Rules, 1981.

Result : Petition allowed

JUDGMENT :

1. The batch of petitions involve similar controversy, therefore, on request of the learned counsels for the parties, the writ petitions are being decided by a common judgment and order.

2. Heard Sri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Man Bahadur Singh and Sri Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi, learned counsels appearing for the petitioners. In all other matters, learned counsels for the petitioners have adopted the arguments advanced by learned Senior Advocate. Smt. Archana Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel has advanced arguments on behalf of State; Sri Yatindra, Sri Vikram Bahadur Singh, Sri Arun Kumar and Sri Sanjy Kumar, Advocates, have put in appearance on behalf of Uttar Pradesh Board of Basic Education and have advanced their submissions.

3. Facts of writ petition No.–988/2021 is being referred to for the sake of convenience. The facts, interse, parties is not in dispute.

4. Petitioners, herein, are working in Junior Basic Schools in various districts of Uttar Pradesh, run and managed by the Uttar Pradesh Board of Basic Education, Board. Petitioners came to be selected and appointed pursuant to Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination-2018.

5. By the instant petitions, petitioners have raised challenge to the legality and validity of the Government Order dated 4 December 2020, insofar Para 5(1), therein, denies issuance of No-Objection Certificate, NOC, to the working teachers. A further direction has been sought directing the respondents to issue NOC to the petitioners and to appoint them in the district of their choice.

6. The facts, giving rise to the instant petition, briefly stated, is that pursuant to the Government Order dated 01 December 2019, applications were invited by the Board for Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination-2019, ATRE-2019. Petitioners, being eligible and there being no prohibition/bar in the Government Order, applied to enable them to improve their merit and procure placement in a district of their choice. It is pointed out that the post of Assistant Teacher is a district cadre. As per Government Order dated 07 January 2019, the candidates belonging to General or open category were to obtain 65% marks, whereas, the candidates under reserved categories (scheduled caste, scheduled tribes and other backward classes) had to secure 60% marks. ATRE-2019 result was declared on 12 May 2020. As against 69000 vacancies 1,46,060 candidates were successful in securing minimum pass percentage marks.

7. The relevant extract of Government Order 7 January 2019 and Notification 16 May 2020 indicating the number of vacancies, the pass percentage marks and the number of qualified candidates is extracted:

    lsok esa]

1 funs'kd

jkT; 'kSf{kd vuala/kku ,oa Áf'k{k.k ifj"kn]

mRrj Áns'k] y[kuÅA

csfld f'k{kk vuqHkkx & 4 y[kuÅ

2 lfpo

ijh{kk fu;ked Ákf/kdkjh]

m0Á0 Á;kxjktA

fnukad% 07 tuojh] 2019

fo"k;%& mRrj Áns'k csfld f'k{kk ifj"kn }kjk lapkfyr ifj"knh; ÁkFkfed fo|ky;ksa gsrq ^^lgk;d v/;kid HkrhZ ijh{kk 2019** esa U;wure mRrh.kkZad fu/kkZfjr fd;s tkus ds lEcU/k esaA
egksn;]
mi;qZDr fo"k;d lfpo] csfld f'k{kk ifj"kn ds i= la[;k& cs0f'k0i0&16426&27@2018&19 fnukad 05 tuojh] 2019 dk lanHkZ xzg.k djsa] ftlsd }kjk ^^lgk;d v/;kid HkrhZ ijh{kk 2019** esa U;wure ^^mRrh.kZad** fu/kkZfjr fd;s tkus dk vuqjks/k fd;k x;k gSA
2&bl lEcU/k esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funsZ'k gqvk gS fd 'kklu }kjk lE;d~ fopkjksijkUr ^^lgk;d v/;kid HkrhZ ijh{kk 2019** ds vk;kstu gsrq fuxZr 'kklukns'k la[;k& 2056@68&4&2018 fnukad 01-12-2018 ds Øe esa ijh{kk ifj.kke gsrq fuEuor~ U;wure mRrh.kkZad fu/kkZfjr fd;k tkrk gSA ;g U;wure mRrh.kkZad ek= ^^lgk;d v/;kid HkrhZ ijh{kk 2019** ds fy;s gh gksxk %&
¼d½ lkekU; oxZ ds vH;fFkZ;ksa dks iw.kkZad 150 esa ls 97 vad vFkkZr~ 65 Áfr'kr ,oa vf/kd vad ÁkIr djus okys vH;fFkZ;ksa dks ^^lgk;d v/;kid HkrhZ ijh{kk] 2019** gsrq mRrh.kZ ekuk tk;sxkA
¼[k½ vU; leLr vkjf{kr oxZ ds vH







































      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top