JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.

2. This criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 13.02.2015 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur in Criminal Case No.26 of 2014 (Virendra Kumar Yadav Vs. State), under Sections 419, 420, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali, District-Jaunpur. By the impugned order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 504 and 506 I.P.C. against the revisionist/accused Dr. Kalawati Shukla and has issued summon to her.

3. The facts of the case in brief are that the opposite party no.2 filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. alleging therein that the applicant is an educated unemployed youth. His maternal uncle-Raj Bahadur Yadav a milkman was supplying milk at the house of opposite party-Dr. Kalawati Shukla. She said to Raj Bahadur Yadav that if there is any unemployed educated youth in his family then she can employ him as there are vacancies in the Family Health Department and she being Chief Medical Officer Badaun has influence in the department, but for