JUDGMENT :

RENU AGARWAL, J.

1. Instant criminal revision under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 27.08.2012 passed in Criminal Revision No. 136 of 2012 (Sanjay Sinha and Others vs. State and Another) passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Lucknow by which the learned District and Sessions Judge, Lucknow has partly allowed the revision and set-aside the order of CJM by which the opposite party No. 2 to 4 were summoned under Section 506 I.P.C.

2. When the case was called up today for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the revisionist. It transpires from the order sheet dated 05.05.2023 that none was present on behalf of the revisionist on that day also.

3. Heard Mr. Arun Sinha, learned counsel for opposite parties and perused the entire material brought on record.

4. Perusal of the revision reveals that some civil dispute was pending between the revisionist and the private respondents who were empanelled with Employees State Insurance Corporation, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “ESIC”). The revisionist acceding to the request of the accused mutually agreed to provide his consultancy service on the payment of 20 per cent of