ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Sokendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. The instant criminal appeals have been filed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 31.8.2006 passed by the Sessions Judge, Meerut in S.T. No. 730/2002 (State vs. Pawan and Others), under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and in S.T. No. 961/2002 (State vs. Pappu @ Jitendra @ Bijendra), under Section 25 of the Arms Act, both P.S. Partapur, Meerut, convicting accused (Pawan, Kendra, Pappu @ Jitendra @ Bijendra) for offence under Section 302/201 IPC and sentencing each of them with imprisonment of life and fine of Rs. 5000/- under Section 302 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 201 IPC. Apart from it, accused Pappu @ Jitendra @ Bijendra was also convicted and sentenced with rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 25 of the Arms Act.
2. Being aggrieved therefrom, accused Sokendra and Pappu @ Jitendra @ Bijendra preferred Criminal Appeal No. 6075 of 2006 and accused Pawan preferred Criminal Appeal No. 5482 of 2006 for setting aside their conviction and passing an order of acquittal.
3. Since common issues are involved in both the appeals, both are being disposed of by a common order. T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.