IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
ATTAU RAHMAN MASOODI, SAROJ YADAV, JJ.
Karuna Shanker – Appellant
Versus
Rajkishore – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 267 of 1983
Decided On : 30-05-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 34, 302 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Offence of Murder - Criminal Appeal - Held, F.I.R. was lodged promptly inquest was conducted complainant was recorded statement of another witness recorded Investigating Officer as has been stated witnesses have proved case of prosecution beyond all reasonable doubts no reason to doubt testimony of eye witnesses established from evidence on record murder of deceased was committed by convicts appellants association with two unknown miscreants - Court has rightly held accused persons guilty and sentenced them accordingly with imprisonment for appears no ground or reason for interference in conviction and sentence recorded by trial Court - Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT :
SAROJ YADAV, J.
1. This criminal appeal has been filed by the convicts/appellants namely Karuna Shankar alias Pappu and Rajkishore alias Kallu (herein after referred to as Karuna Shankar and Rajkishore) against the judgment and order dated 15.04.1983 passed in Sessions Trial No. 562 of 1982 by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Unnao wherein convicts/appellants were convicted and sentenced under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short I.P.C.) for life imprisonment.
2. The facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are as under:
Dalbir Kaur vs. State of Punjab
Harbans Kaur vs. State of Haryana (2005) 9 SCC 195
Motive is not essential for conviction in murder cases if direct and credible eyewitness testimony is present.
Prosecution has failed to prove charges levelled against accused persons under Sections 302/34, 201 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act by any reliable, cogent and independent evidence to hilt beyond reas....
The court upheld the conviction for murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, emphasizing the need for extreme caution in imposing capital punishment.
The reliability of an injured eye-witness testimony and its corroboration by medical evidence are crucial in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on credible evidence, including witness testimony and medical findings, even absent direct physical evidence like weapon recovery.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.