Back
ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, SYED AFTAB HUSAIN RIZVI
Rajesh Alias Bachchan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi, J.
1. Heard Sri V.P. Srivastava, and Sri Dilip Kumar, learned Senior Counsels assisted by Sri Ranjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent in criminal appeals and Sri Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the Revisionist and Sri Ranjay Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party and learned AGA for the State-respondent.
2. All the aforesaid criminal appeals and Revision have been filed against the judgment and order dated 22.12.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, court no.7 Ballia in S.T. No. 167 of 2006 (State vs. Basdeo & others) in case crime no.1 of 2006 under Sections 147, 148, 302, 307, 436, 435, 336, 342, 353, 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Pakari, District-Ballia.
By the impugned judgment and order dated 22.12.2006, the learned trial court has convicted the accused-appellants namely-Brahmdeo Chauhan, Ravindra Chauhan, Rajesh alias Babban Yadav, Arvind Gaur, Kamla Rajbhar, Guddu Rajbhar, Rambhawan Rajbhar, Gama Rajbhar, Jawahir Chauhan, Harish Chand Rajbhar, Ramashankar Rajbhar, Basudeo Rajbhar under Section 147 IPC and sentenced eac
Power of High Court is very limited and as a general rule the High Court will not interfere in revision against the order of acquittal unless there is a gross error of law.
The appellate court can set aside a trial court's finding of acquittal if it finds that the finding is perverse and against the weight of evidence.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to unreliable evidence and inconsistencies in eyewitness testimonies, reaffirming the presumption of innocence and caution in overruling pos....
(1) Appreciation of evidence – Testimonies of prosecution witnesses, before their acceptance must be tested on established parameters of appreciation of evidence.(2) Appreciation of evidence – Positi....
Murder – Once common object of unlawful assembly stands established, every member thereof becomes vicariously liable for acts committed in prosecution of such common object.
(1) Common object of unlawful assembly has to be determined from facts and circumstances of each case.(2) Grave suspicion cannot take place of proof. It is for prosecution to prove its case beyond re....
The court established that when intent to kill is absent but culpable homicide is evident, conviction under IPC §304 Part II is justified, despite minor discrepancies in witness testimonies not under....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
