RAJNISH KUMAR
Sunder Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Vijay Bahadur Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rajeev Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The writ petition No.808 (MS) of 1991, writ petition No.807 (MS) of 1991, writ petition No.809 (MS) of 1991 and writ petition No.810 (MS) of 1991 arises out of the common judgment and order dated 27.10.1989 passed by the Prescribed Authority/opposite party no.3 by means of which four applications of the petitioner under Section 11(2) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act 1960 (hereinafter referred as the Ceiling Act) have been dismissed and the order dated 30.01.1991, passed by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Lucknow Division, Lucknow/opposite party no.2 in four appeals filed by the petitioner. Therefore, they have been clubbed together and are being decided together by a common judgment and order.
3. The brief facts of the case, for adjudication of the aforesaid cases as alleged in the writ petitions are that Kunwar Yudhendra Bahadur Singh son of Jayendra Bahadur Singh was the original tenure holder of the land in dispute who acquired the disputed property by means of a partition decree dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.