JUDGMENT :

(Jaspreet Singh, J.)

C. M. Applications No.5 and 6 of 2022

1. The instant two applications have been moved by the petitioner to bring on record the heirs of deceased respondent no.2 Dinanath who is reported to have died on 20.10.2017. The record indicates that the notices were issued to the proposed legal heirs of the deceased. In furtherance whereof Shri Rajeiur Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel has filed his Vakalatnama.

2. Considering the aforesaid facts and the ground shown in the application which is found sufficient, accordingly, the applications are allowed. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel shall carry out the necessary amendment during the course of the day.

3. Heard Shri G.K. Pathak, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-petitioner and Shri Rejeiu Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for private respondents on merits.

4. By means of the instant petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the State challenges the judgment and order dated 27.11.1979 passed by the District Judge in Ceiling Appeal No.148 of 1979 whereby the appeal of the private respondents was allowed and the order dated 26.03.1979 passed by the P