IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Ramesh Sinha, Vivek Varma, JJ.
Ajay Singh - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Urban Dept. Lko. & Ors. - Respondent
P.I.L. CIVIL No. - 27598 of 2021
Decided On : 26-11-2021
Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Section 122-B, 49 (b) and 49 (c) - Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children), Act 2015 - Section 105 - It appears that petitioner, in instant Public Interest Litigation, is claiming that private respondent, in connivance with revenue officials, has unauthorizedly occupied large land of State, which are recorded in old revenue record as State land in name of ‘Registry Aspatal’ and ‘Kanzi House’, hence respondent may be directed to take immediate action to dispossess unauthorized occupant from land in question.
Findings of the court :
In view of aforesaid discussions, not only there is no merit in this petition, but same is also mischievous and has only resulted in wastage of precious Court's time, which could have been better utilized for disposal of the cases for genuine litigant(s).
Result : Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent no.7 by Shri Hemant Kumar Misra, Advocate, is taken on record.
2. The petitioner, Ajay Singh, in the present Public Interest Litigation seeks following reliefs :-
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties 2, 4 and 5 to issue a public notice in widely circulated newspapers notifying therein about land bearing Khasra Plot Nos. 471, 472, 473, 474 and 475 situated at Mankapur Town, Tehsil Mankapur, District-Gonda to be State land/public utility land
iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to take immediate action to dispossess unauthorized occupant from the State land as requested by opposite party no. 6 by letter dated 01.08.2019 as contained in Annexure no.5 to this petition."
3. It appears that the petitioner, in the instant Public Interest Litigation, is claiming that private respondent no.7, in connivance with revenue officials, has unauthorizedly occupied large land of the State, bearing Gata Nos. 471, 472, 473 and 474 situate in Tehsil Mankapur, District Gonda, which are recorded in the old revenue record as State land in the name of ‘Registry Aspatal’ and ‘Kanzi House’, hence respondent no.2 may be directed to take immediate action to dispossess unauthorized occupant from the land in question.
4. Learned Counsel for the respondent no.7, on the other hand, submitted that the petitioner is having criminal history as twenty-nine criminal cases in heinous offences have been registered against him. In support of his submission, he has filed a list of pending criminal cases against the petitioner, which are reproduced as under :-
(2) Case Crime No. 112 of 2004, under Section 110 G Cr.P.C., Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(3) Case Crime No. 262 of 2005, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(4) Case Crime No. 221 of 2005, under Sections 143, 336, 352, 188 IPC, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(5) Case Crime No. 194 of 2006, under Sections 4/10 of Forest Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(6) Case Crime No. 224 of 2001, under Section 406 IPC, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(7) Case Crime No. 242 of 2007, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Goondas Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(8) Case Crime No.208 of 2008, under Section 420 IPC, Sections 4/10 Forest Act and Sections 3/28 of U.P. Transit of Timber and other under Forest Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(9) Case Crime No. 207 of 2008, under Sections 379 and 411 IPC, Sections 4/10 Forest Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(10) Case Crime No. 11 of 2009, under Sections 147, 323, 352 IPC, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(11) Case Crime No. 53 of 2009, under Sections 395, 447, 506 IPC, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(12) Case Crime No. 78 of 2009, under Section 110 G Cr.P.C., Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(13) Case Crime No. 221 of 2009, under Sections 4/10 of Forest Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(14) Case Crime No. 542 of 2009, under Sections 4/10 of Forest Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(15) Case Crime No. 192 of 2011, under Sections 4/10 of Forest Act, Police Station Mankapur, District Gonda.
(16) C
State of Maharashtra vs. Prabhu
Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation vs. M/s GAR Re-Rolling Mills and Anr.
Dr. B.K. Subbarao vs. Mr. K. Parasaran
Kushum Lata versus Union of India and others : (2006) 6 SCC 180
Janta Dal v. H.S. Chowdhary (1992 (4) SCC 305)
Ramjas Foundation vs. Union of India
K.R. Srinivas v. R.M. Premchand
State of Uttaranchal versus Balwant Singh Chaufal and Ors. : (2010) 3 SCC 402
Jaipur Shahar Hindu Vikas Samiti versus State of Rajasthan and others : (2014) 5 SCC 530
Tehseen Poonawalla vs. Union of India and another (2018) 6 SCC 72
Point of Law : Courts must do justice by promotion of good faith, and prevent law from crafty invasions. Courts must maintain the social balance by interfering where necessary for the sake of justice....
Public Interest Litigation - Health delivery system in the State of Uttar Pradesh - Not maintainable as petition not espousing cause of any member of a disadvantageous section of society or any perso....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of genuine public interest litigation, the duty of petitioners to disclose their credentials and the public cause they seek to espou....
Public interest litigants must have clean hands and credible credentials, and the courts must validate claims to prevent frivolous petitions, while retaining the sanctity of public interest litigatio....
Public Interest Litigation must meet strict bona fides and credential requirements to prevent misuse for personal gain.
Public Interest Litigations must be filed by individuals with clean hands and bona fide intentions; failure to disclose criminal antecedents can lead to dismissal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.