SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 22

Mustakeem – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ajeet Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Mishra (A.C.)
For the Respondent: A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Rajendra Kumar-IV, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgement and order dated 13.02.1990 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur in Session Trial No.264 of 1989, under Sections 376/511 I.P.C., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Shahjahanpur by which trial court convicting the accused-appellant for the offence punishable under Section 376/511 I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo 4 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 500/-with default stipulation, accused-appellant has preferred the present appeal.

2. As per prosecution case, on 12.08.1987 in the evening, informant's brother Shahjad left the house and went to visit Lal Imli Chauraha, when he did not get home till late, his younger sister victim aged about 9 years went to find out her brother. While going to cross road near biscuit factory of Atiullah, accused-appellant met her. He caught hold the hand of victim and started taking towards Mazar, victim / prosecutrix tried to raise alarm, accused pressed her mouth by his hand and threatened her to kill. He took her to Mazar and untied the victim's salwar. He made her to lie on the earth and tried to rape her. When victim shout

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top