JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the revisionist and Mr. Vaibhav Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3.

2. By means of the instant revision filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act read with Section 397/401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the revisionist has challenged the order dated 13.08.2021 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Faizabad in Case No.187 of 2020 (Smt. Samiksha Saran & Another Vs. Anubhav Verma), whereby the application filed by the opposite party no. 2 seeking interim maintenance from the revisionist has been decided and as against the demand of Rs.50,000/-per month towards maintenance of the opposite party nos.2 and 3 who are the wife and the minor daughter of the revisionist, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court has directed the revisionist to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/-per month to his wife and Rs.15,000/-per month to his daughter. He has also challenged the order dated 27-09-2021, whereby the Family Court has rejected his application “FOR REVIEW AND SET ASIDE THE INTERIM MAINTENANCE ORDER PASSED ON 13.08.2021”.

3. The revisionist has contended that the Principal Judge, Family Court has not