SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 263

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, JAYANT BANERJI
Kusumlata – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rakesh Dubey, Arvind Srivastava

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner and Sri Girish Vishwakarma, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.

2. This special appeal has been filed praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 29.11.2021 in Writ-C No.21935 of 2021 (Smt. Kusumlata vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) passed by the learned Single Judge.

3. The aforesaid writ petition was filed by the petitioner praying for the following relief :

    “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 S.D.M. Bharthana District Etawah to consider the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment of under the U.P. Essential Commodities Act (Rules and Distribution Order, 2016).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to appoint the petitioner as dealer in place of her father at Newadi Khurd, Nyay Panchayat-Aheripur, Block-Maheva, Pargana- Bharthana, District Etawah under the dying in harness rule prescribed under U.P. Essential Commodities Act (Rules and Distribution

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top