Pushpa Devi vs State Of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 1153

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(All) 1153

NEERAJ TIWARI
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : Ashok Kumar Pandey
For The Respondent: C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi

JUDGMENT :

Neeraj Tiwari, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri D.K. Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. By way of present petition, petitioner is challenging the order dated 17.06.2021 passed by respondent no. 3 contained as Annexure no. 1 to the writ petition, rejecting the application of the petitioner for allotment of fair price shop and also Government Order dated 05.08.2019 issued by the Special Secretary, Government of U.P., Lucknow contained as Annexure no. 8 to the writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is widowed daughter-in-law of late Mahadei Devi, who was earlier allotted fair price shop. He further submitted that husband of the petitioner namely Bablu died in a road accident leaving behind the petitioner as well as two daughters aged about 11 years and 6 years. Petitioner and her daughters are fully dependent upon late Mahadei Devi, earlier fair price shop holder, who died on 11.04.2021. Succession certificate was also issued by Gram Pradhan on 30.06.2021 mentioning therein that petitioner is legal heir of late Mahadei Devi wife of late Killu Yadav. She is Intermediate passed