SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA
Kamlesh Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Annapurna Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri S.D. Kautilya, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri H.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This second appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 12.09.1997 passed in First Appeal No.12/1993 (Smt. Annapurna Devi and others vs. Pt. Ram Shankar Shukla substituted by his legal heirs) by learned First Additional District Judge, Pilibhit by which learned court has allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 28.11.1981 passed by Civil Judge, Pilibhit in O.S. No.49/2007 (Ram Shankar Shukla Vs. Smt. Annapurna Devi and Harish Chandra Bajpai) holding that Smt. Ramshri Kunwar (mother of Smt. Annapurna Devi) became full owner of the property in suit by virtue of Section 14 (1) of the Hindu Succession Act and not a licencee.
3. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are in brief that Pt. Jagan Mohan Shukla was owner of movable and immovable property. He had two wives, one Smt. Ramshri Kunwar and other Smt. Saraswati Devi. Smt. Annapurna Devi was daughter of Smt. Ramshri Kunwar and Pt. Ram Shankar Shukla was son of Smt. Saraswati Kunwar. Sri Ram Shankar Shukla was represented by his son Kamlesh Kumar, daughter Smt. Indra Prak
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.