SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 251

State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Dharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent: Vinay Saran, Virendra Saran

JUDGMENT :

Suneet Kumar, J.

1. Heard Sri Vikas Goswami, learned Additional Government Advocate and Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava learned counsel appearing for the accused respondent.

2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25 February 1989 passed by the Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad in Sessions Trial No. 784 of 1988 (State vs. Dharmu alias Dharam Singh) arising from Case Crime No. 183 of 1988, under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Kannauj, District Farrukhabad, whereby, accused-respondent was acquitted.

3. As per prosecution case FIR came to be lodged on 21.05.1988 at 18:40 hours, alleging that daughter of the complainant, aged about 10 years, had gone out at 10:00 a.m. to graze goats, accused reached at the field where accused caught hold of his daughter and dropped her on the ground holding her mouth and committed offence of rape. The persons passing nearby exhorted the accused, he thereafter ran away. It is further alleged that the victim was bleeding from her private part; on return, to the house after selling bangles, complainant was informed of the

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top