JUDGMENT :

Saral Srivastava, J.

1. The present revision has been preferred by the defendants (hereinafter referred to as 'applicant') against the judgment and order dated 16.12.2020 passed by Additional District Judge, (FTC), Mahoba granting leave to suit under Section 92 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'CPC')

2. The facts, in short, are that the respondents-plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as 'respondent') instituted a suit under Section 92 of CPC praying for a decree to remove the applicants from the trustee in Shree Ram Laxman Janakiji Vakai Mandir, Dubiyana, District Mohoba and further, the applicant no. 1 be directed to submit the account of trust and to return the money of trust which is in the hands of applicant no. 1. Further relief prayed was that a trustee be appointed in the trust to manage the property and temple as per the trust deed.

3. The plaint case is that one Shiv Charan Lal was the owner of a one-story house, the shops situated in Khanga Bazar Grantganj, District Mahoba, two-third part of Khata Khewat Number-2, Mauja Tindauli Mohal Dariyaw Patti Murtaja Hussain Khan, Pargana Mohaba, and one Bagh adjacent to Ramleela. He got constructed a Devalya known as Ram Laxman Janakiji. He executed a trust deed dated 06.10.1909 registered on 07.10.1909 to manage the temple. The aforesaid properties owned by Shiv Charan Lal were dedicated to Shree Ram Laxman Janakiji by the trust deed and proceeds of said property are to be used for maintenance, Pooja, and Bhog of the temple. Trust is a public charitable trust. The temple is in a dilapidated condition, and the applicant no. 1 who manages the trust is not maintaining the temple from the income of the properties of the trust. Further, the allegation in the plaint is that the trust owns a big market consisting of small shops over the house owned by the Trust which has been let out on rent. The income of the trust is being used by applicant no. 1 for his personal use. It is further stated that a part of shops owned by the trust has been let out to Union Bank of India at the rate of Rs.17,738/- per month and rent paid by the bank is also used by applicant no. 1 for his personal use. The respondents claim that they belong to the family of the applicants and used to visit the temple for Pooja and as such, they have an interest in the temple of trust. The relevant paragraphs of the plaint are extracted herein-below:-

^^1- ;g fd Jh f'kopju yky iq= Jh HkSjks Álkn frokjh fuoklh egksck [kkl ,d eafty nqdku iq[rk okdS [kuxk cktkj fLFkr xzkUVxat dLck egksck o [kkrk [ksoV uEcj&2 ekStk frUnkSyh eksgky nj;ko iV~Vh eqjrtk gqlSu [kka ijxuk egksck dks nks frgkbZ o ,d ckx tks jkeyhyk ls feyk gqvk gS ds ekfyd o dkfct FksA mUgksaus ,d f'kokyk iq[rk Jh jke y{e.k tkudh th dk dLck egksck esa cuok;k FkkA mlh ejEer o Hkksx o iwtk vkfn ds laca/k esa tk;nkn gLc rlhy tSy dks mDr Jh jkey{e.k tkudh th VªLV dks tkfj;s jftLVªh'kqnk VªLVukek fnukafdr 6 vDVwcj 1909 dks rgjhj fd;k ftldh jftLVªh cgh uEcj 1 ftYn uEcj 22 ds lQk 154 rk 156 cuEcj 188 rkjh[k 07 vDVwcj lu 1909 dks jftLVªh dh x;hA

2- ;g fd mDr VªLVukek ds varxZr vkjkft;kr gLc rlhy tSy ds ekfyd Jh jkey{e.k tkudh th okdS dLck egksck gq;s vkSj mijksDr tk;nkn ls mDr eafnj dh ns[kjs[k iwtk o Hkksx vkfn dk fd;k tkuk r; fd;k x;k FkkA

4- ;g fd mijksDr VªLV jkey{e.k tkudh th ,d lkoZtkfud /kkfeZd ifCyd pSjhVscqy VªLV gS ftlds fd mDr loZjkgdkjku dk;e fd;s x;s FksA

8- ;g fd mDr VªLV dk eafnj cM+h th.kZ 'kh.kZ fLFkfr esa gS vkSj ml ij dksbZ [kpZ Áfroknh uEcj 1 tks VªLV dk bUreke djrk gS [kpZ ugha dj jgk gS vkSj og eafnj Lor% fxjkÅ gkyr esa gSA

9- ;g fd mijksDr VªLV dh lEifr Hkou@nqdku fLFkr xzkUVxat tks eqUntkZ 'ksM;wy ^v* esa gS og ,d cgqr cM+k ekdsZV gS vkSj ml nqdku esa cgqr lh NksVh NksVh nqdkus cuh gS esa VªLV ds cgqr ls fdjk;snkjku vkckn gS ftlls VªLV dh vkenuh yk[kksa :i;k ekgokj fdjk;k vkrk gS tks Áfroknh uEcj 1 Lor% olwy dj jgk gSA ;gka rd mDr VªLV dh lEifr esa nqdku dk tqt Hkkx ftldk {ks=Qy 1267 oxZ fQV gS dk fdjk;snkj ;wfu;u cS