CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Nishant Poonia – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chandra Kumar Rai, J.
1. Heard Sri D.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mrs. Anita Srivastava, learned Counsel for respondent nos.4 to 6, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3 and Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.7- Gaon Sabha.
2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties the writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage.
3. Brief facts of the case are that the suit under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was filed before the trial Court by the plaintiffs-petitioners in respect of the disputed Khasra No.105, 127 and 149, total area 2.6450 hectare. An application for interim relief under Section 146 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was also filed and learned trial Court granted interim order on 30th November, 2019 to the effect that the authorities shall not alienate the property in dispute, by the subsequent order dated 7.9.2020 after hearing the counsel for the parties and even considering the provisions contained under Section 146 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has confirmed the interim order dated 30th November, 2019 passed earlier. Against the order dated 30th November, 2019, defendants
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.