SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 584

K. J. THAKER, GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Anil Kumar Srivastava, Ram Bahadur, Yogesh Kumar Srivastava, Raghubeer Singh.
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

K.J. Thaker, J.

1. Both these appeals challenges the judgment and order dated 9.2.2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Firozabad in Sessions Trial No.245 of 2015 convicting accused-appellant-Pushpa Devi, under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and sentenced her to undergo simple imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment for three months; she was further convicted under Section 323 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months with fine of Rs.500/- and in case of default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for one months; she was further convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The accused-appellant-Bantu @Vimal Babu and accused-appellant-Munni Devi were convicted under Section 498A IPC and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top