RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
Satish – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner challenges the order dated 30.10.2019 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, NOIDA, refusing additional compensation for his acquired land, claimed on the basis of a right hereinafter detailed.
2. The petitioner's land comprising Khasra No. 545 admeasuring 7-14-15 situate in village Tugalpur, Pargana Dadari, Tehsil Sadar, District Gautam Buddh Nagar was proposed to be acquired by the State Government vide notification issued under Section 4(1) read with Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ''the Act') dated September 9, 1997. A declaration under Section 6 read with Section 17 (1) of the Act dated October 9, 1998 followed. The acquired land of Khasra No. 545 (supra) shall hereinafter be referred to as ''the land in dispute'.
3. The land in dispute was acquired according to the notification under Section 4(1) and the declaration under Section 6(1) for the purpose of "planned industrial development" for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Besides the land in dispute, lands of other tenure holders of village Tugalpur were also acquired. Award in respect of the acquired land in the village including the land in dispute was pronoun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.