Back
Bhikari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. Heard Sri Navin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to allot 5% developed land in terms of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Gajraj Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2011 (11) ADJ 1 (FB).
3. The petitioners claim to be owners of khata no. 45 khasra no. 328 area 0.158 hectares situate in Village Sorkha Zahidabad, Pargana and Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar which were subject matter of acquisition proceedings in terms of notification dated 12.04.2005 issued under Section 4 (1)/17(4), and the notification dated 27.07.2006 issued under Section 6/17 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners admit to have accepted the compensation amount.
4. The petitioners have specifically stated that they did not challenge the land acquisition proceedings. The writ petition is also silent as to whether the notifications under which the land of the petitioners was acquired, were under challenge in the bunch of writ pet
The benefit granted by the Full Bench cannot be extended to similarly situated persons. The relief in the case of Gajraj Singh was granted by the High Court in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdict....
The land owners were not entitled to the allotment of 10% developed land in lieu of their acquired land, as the directions of the High Court in the unique and peculiar/specific background would not f....
The court affirmed the validity of the land acquisition process by the Bangalore Development Authority, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and the necessity of balancing public interest....
A policy decision by the State Government can have an overriding effect over private treaties between the Government and a private party, if the same was in the general public interest and provided s....
The court upheld the legality of land acquisition notifications while rejecting claims against compensation assessments, emphasizing public purpose over individual land rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
