SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 674

Pawan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Yogesh Kumar Srivastava, Noor Muhammad

JUDGMENT :

Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, Gautam Chowdhary, JJ.

(Per Dr. Justice K.J. Thaker, J.)

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 9.3.2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No.2, Firozabad in Sessions Trial No.616 of 2014 convicting accused-appellant under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.10,000/-and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo imprisonment for six months.

2. Factual scenario as culled out from the record and the judgment of the Court below is that the accused-appellant is alleged to have set ablaze the deceased on 9.5.2014 when the accused went to the house of the deceased and demanded sum of Rs.10,000/-and when the deceased refused to give the said amount and requested him to come when her husband was in the house, the accused started abusing her and in his anger, poured kerosene on her and set her ablaze.

3. On the complaint of the husband of the deceased, First Information Report being No.387 of 2014 was regist

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top