IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Sameer Jain, J.
Arun Pandey and Others – Applicants
Versus
State of U.P. and another – Opposite Parties
Application U/S 482 No. - 11897 of 2022
Decided On : 14-09-2022
Cognizance Order - Non-Cognizable Offences - Sections 352, 323, 504 IPC - Section 2(d) Cr.P.C.
Fact of the Case:
Opposite party no.2 lodged a NCR against the applicants under Sections 352, 323, 504 IPC. Charge-sheet was submitted against the applicants and the court took cognizance. Applicants argued that the offences were non-cognizable and the cognizance order was illegal. They also claimed that the allegations were false due to a property dispute.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the charge-sheet was filed for non-cognizable offences and explained the procedure under Section 2(d) Cr.P.C. The court held that the cognizance order was in accordance with the law and that prima facie offences were made out against the applicants.
Issues: Validity of Cognizance Order for Non-Cognizable Offences, False Allegations Due to Property Dispute
Ratio Decidendi: Explanation to Section 2(d) Cr.P.C. does not apply to cases where investigation was commenced for non-cognizable offences. Cognizance can be taken on the basis of charge-sheet for non-cognizable offences.
Final Decision: The application to quash the proceedings was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2 is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Dinesh Rai, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Dr. S.B. Maurya, learned AGA-I for the State.
3. By way of present application, applicants made prayer to quash the entire proceedings of R.N. No. 99 of 2021 (State Vs. Arun Kumar Pandey and others) arising out of N.C.R. No. 36 of 2020, under Sections 352, 323, 504 IPC, Police Station Oonj, District Bhadohi pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate-II, Bhadohi at Gyanpur as well as cognizance order dated 06.01.2021.
4. Filtering out unnecessary details, the necessary facts of the case are as :-
(ii) Pursuant to the order passed by Magistrate concerned under Section 155(2) Cr.P.C., investigation of the case was conducted and after investigation charge-sheet has been submitted against the applicants under Section 352, 323, 504 IPC and court below on 06.01.2021 took the cognizance and issued summons to the applicants.
5. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that as charge-sheet in the present matter was submitted under Sections 352, 323, 504 IPC and all the offences are non-cognizable, therefore, in view of explanation to Section 2(d) Cr.P.C. cognizance order dated 06.01.2021 passed by the court below is bad. He further submitted that as per explanation to Section 2(d) Cr.P.C. if after investigation charge-sheet was submitted in respect to the non-cognizable offences then charge-sheet must be deemed to be a complaint and the police officer, who conducted the investigation shall be deemed to the complainant of the case, therefore, in such matters, proceeding can only be initiated as a complaint case but in the present matter the court did not treat the charge-sheet as a complaint and court below in routine manner took the cognizance on the charge-sheet and issued summons to the applicants, therefore, cognizance order dated 06.01.2021 is illegal.
6. Learned counsel for the applicants further submitted that the entire allegation made against the applicants in the NCR and in the statements of the witnesses are totally false and baseless and in fact applicants neither made any assault nor caused any injury. He further submitted that a dispute in respect of property is pending between the parties and in this regard a civil suit is also pending and only due to this reason opposite party no.2 implicated the applicants in the present matter, therefore, from this angle too charge-sheet filed against the applicants is bad.
7. Per contra, learned AGA and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submitted that there is no illegality in the summoning order dated 06.01.2021 as after perusing the entire documents available on record, court below took the cognizance and issued summons to the applicants and even if there is any irregularity in taking the cognizance then it does not vitiate the proceedings pending against the applicants. Learned AGA further submitted that from the perusal of the NCR and statements of witnesses including injured witnesses, the complicity of applicants reveals in the present matter and prima facie offences under Section 352, 323, 504 IPC are made out against them and there is also injury report of the injured on record thus there is no illegality in the charge-sheet submitted against the applicants. He further submitted that defence taken by the applicants cannot be appreciated at this stage.
8. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.
9. From the record, it reflects that on 15.05.2020 opposite party no.2 lodged a NCR under Sections 352, 323, 504 IP
Cognizance of non-cognizable offences must follow complaint procedure, and any delay in cognizance is barred by limitation under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an investigation conducted without the prior permission of the Magistrate, as mandated under Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C., is illegal and renders....
The court emphasized the necessity for adherence to legal procedure in cognizance of non-cognizable offences, reinforcing the right to fair trial and requiring written complaints for filing concernin....
Point of Law : Criminal breach of trust - Conduct of the judicial officers concerned in passing orders on printed proforma by filling up the blanks without application of judicial mind is objectionab....
S.155(2) Cr.P.C stipulates that when information relates to a case indicative of non-cognizable offences, police officer is interdicted from commencing investigation without an order from Magistrate.
A Magistrate must apply judicial mind when taking cognizance of an offence; failure to do so, especially through mechanical processes, renders the order invalid and subject to quashing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.