MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Shivam Solanki – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Chandrachud Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Ishir Sripat, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the State as well as perused the entire material available on record.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet No.57 dated 20.02.2021 and cognizance/summoning order dated 31.03.2021 as well as the entire prosecution of Criminal Case No.13805 of 2021 (State vs. Shivam Solanki), arising out of Case Crime No.504 of 2020, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 386, 376 and 511 IPC, Police Station-Hariparvat, District-Agra, pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra.
3. Brief facts of the case are that for the incident dated 26.12.2020 at about 08:00 hrs, NCR was lodged on 27.12.2020 under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC alleging therein that daughter of opposite party no.2, namely, Riddhi was called by the applicant at the gate of Ram Nagar Colony, using unparliamentary language, when Riddhi objected the same, the applicant assaulted her. On alarm being raised by opposite party no.2, persons
Mangal Prasad Tamoli vs. Narvadeshwar Mishra reported in (2005) 3 SCC 422
Rai Sandeep alias Deepu v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2012) 8 SCC 21
Raju v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar vs. the State of Bihar reported in (2020) 3 SCC 443
State of Punjab vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar and others reported in (2011) 14 SCC 770
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Mahendra alias Golu reported in 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 626
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.