SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 154

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI
Umme Farva – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Manoj Kumar Pandey
For the Respondent: Najam Uz Zaman Khan

JUDGMENT :

PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Satish Kumar Dubey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Najam Uz Zaman Khan, learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and Sri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has filed the instant application under Section 528 BNSS (Corresponding Section 482 Cr.P.C.) with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause of the application.

3. The relief which has been mentioned in the application is delineated below:-

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned Cognizance/summoning order dated 23.10.2024 including the entire proceedings of Misc. Case No. 750/12/2024 (Dr. Mahmood Alam Khan vs. Umme Farva and others) pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh arising out of Case Crime No. 1004/2023, Under Sections 506, 507 IPC registered at Police Station-Kwarsi, District-Aligarh."

4. The brief facts of this case as per the First Information Report is that the Informant/O.P. no.2 was working as a Research Professor in the year 2020 at Hanyang Univers

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top