SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J.
Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and another – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 51323 of 2021
Decided on : 09-09-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr Vineet Vikram, Mr Imran Ullah (Mr G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel)
For the Respondent: Mr Anurag Kumar Singh for CBI, Mr Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Mr Shiv Kumar Pal (GA), Mr Alok Kumar Dubey, Mr Saumitra Dwivedi, Mr Vinay Prakash Shukla, Mr. Rishi Shankar Dwivedi Mr. Niraj Tiwari

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 306 - Bail Application - Accused seeks bail in connection with a suicide case; suicide note identified the accused as instigators. The deceased expressed severe mental agony due to harassment leading to suicide. Additionally, evidence suggested conspiracy to defame the deceased through malicious video. Court held that circumstances indicate abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC due to continued harassment creating pressure leading to extreme action by the deceased. (Paras 29, 30, 34, 41)

(B) Criminal Jurisprudence - Basic principles for bail - The court evaluates prima facie evidence and decides based on severity and nature of accusations; likelihood of influencing witnesses and compromising justice is a key consideration. (Para 26)

Facts of the case:
The deceased wrote a suicide note and recorded videos before his death accusing the applicant and co-accused of harassment and conspiracy to defame him. The harassment included attempts to release morphed videos compromising the deceased's character, triggering his suicide.

Findings of Court:
Bail application rejected based on prima facie case established for abetment of suicide against the applicant. The case reflects a sensitive context where a religious leader was reportedly driven to sui.chromaticide by ongoing defamation attempts and pressure from the accused.

Issues: 1) Was there sufficient evidence of abetment of suicide by the accused? 2) Does the accused pose a risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses if granted bail?

Ratio Decidendi: The court identified that suicide was provoked by the acts of the accused, establishing a link under Section 306 IPC; bail was denied due to the gravity of the offence and risk of tampering with evidence.

Result: Bail application rejected.

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the bail application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of the incident leading to the case. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. investigation process summary. (Para 12 , 13)
4. arguments from defence counsel. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20)
5. state's response and concerns. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. principles for considering bail. (Para 26 , 27)
7. court's analysis of the case. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
8. legal interpretations and outcome. (Para 35 , 36 , 39 , 40)
9. final decisions and directions of the court. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)

ORDER :

INDEX

• Brief Facts

• Submissions on behalf of accused-applicant

• Submissions on behalf of C.B.I.

• Submissions on behalf of informants

• Submissions on behalf of State of U.P.

• Basic principles for considering bail prayer

• Analysis of Case

• Conclusion

• Result

• Observation and Direction

1. By means of this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., applicant-Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. RC-8(S)/2021/SC-III/ND, under Section 306 IPC, PS SC-III/ND, New Delhi lodged by C.B.I, Special Crime-III, New Delhi (earlier registered as Case Crime No. 322 of 2021, under Section 306 IPC at Police Station George-town, District Prayagraj).

Brief Facts

2. The facts that formed the bedrock of the instant bail application moved by accused-applicant Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya are that Mahant Narendra Giri (deceased) was Adyaksh, of “Akhil Bhartiya Akhada Parishad, Mahant/Head of Shri Math “Baghambari Gaddi”, Allahpur, Prayagraj and “Shri Bade/Lete Hanuman Ji Temple”, Prayagraj.

3. On 20.09.2021 at 05:30 PM, Station House Officer, police station-George Town, Prayagraj received an information on his CUG Mobile No. 9454402825 from Mobile No. 7905160834 of Sarvesh Kumar Dwivedi that Mahant Narendra Giri Maharaj has committed suicide in his room by hanging himself inside the Math. Acting on the aforesaid information, he immediately rushed to the place of incident. Meanwhile other senior officers were also informed, who also reached there. The said information was recorded in General Diary No. 51 dated 20.09.2021 of police station-George Town, Prayagraj. On arriving at the place of incident, he found that dead body of Mahant Narendra Giri Maharaj was lying on floor of the room.

Information was also given to field Unit/Crime Branch team. Shri Sunil Kumar, Additional City Magistrate-III, District Prayagraj also reached there for conducting inquest proceeding on cadaver, which commenced at 22:30 hours on 20.09.2021 and completed at 23:45 hours on the same day.

4. A hand written suicide note containing seven pages of Mahant Narendra Giri, which was kept in two open envelops, two mobile phones of the deceased, knife, bloodstained rope, four packets Sulphas (sulphate) and three DVR of CCTV camera installed at the Math etc. were recovered from the spot in the presence of witnesses, officers and forensic team by the Station House Officer, police station-George Town, Prayagraj. After perusing the suicide note, recovery memos (fard) of recovered items were prepared. Finger prints and chance prints of deceased-Mahant Narendra Giri were also taken. Recovered items were sealed at the spot. The site plan was prepared by the police and photography was also done.

5. Mahant Narendra Giri in his suicide note, has categorically held accused Anand Giri, Adhya Prasad Tiwari and Sandeep Tiwari responsible for taking extreme step to end his life. For better appreciation of the facts, the contents of suicide note are being reproduced herein below:-

eSa egar ujsUnz fxjh] eB ck?kEcjh xnnh cMs guqeku eafnj ¼ysVs guqeku th½ orZeku es v/;{k vf[ky Hkkjrh; v[kkMk ifj"kn vius gks'kks gokl ess cxSj fdlh ncko esa ;g i= fy[k jgk gwW tc ls vkuUn fxjh us esjs Åij vlR; feF;k euxढ+r vkjksi yxk;k rc ls eSa ekufld ncko esa th jgk gwa tc Hkh eSa ,dkar es jgrk gwa ej tkus dh bPNk


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top