Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 997

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr Vineet Vikram, Mr Imran Ullah (Mr G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel)
For the Respondent: Mr Anurag Kumar Singh for CBI, Mr Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Mr Shiv Kumar Pal (GA), Mr Alok Kumar Dubey, Mr Saumitra Dwivedi, Mr Vinay Prakash Shukla, Mr. Rishi Shankar Dwivedi Mr. Niraj Tiwari

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the bail application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. details of the incident leading to the case. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. investigation process summary. (Para 12 , 13)
4. arguments from defence counsel. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20)
5. state's response and concerns. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. principles for considering bail. (Para 26 , 27)
7. court's analysis of the case. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
8. legal interpretations and outcome. (Para 35 , 36 , 39 , 40)
9. final decisions and directions of the court. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)

ORDER :

INDEX

• Brief Facts

• Submissions on behalf of accused-applicant

• Submissions on behalf of C.B.I.

• Submissions on behalf of informants

• Submissions on behalf of State of U.P.

• Basic principles for considering bail prayer

• Analysis of Case

• Conclusion

• Result

• Observation and Direction

1. By means of this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., applicant-Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. RC-8(S)/2021/SC-III/ND, under Section 306 IPC, PS SC-III/ND, New Delhi lodged by C.B.I,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(All) 997

SANJAY KUMAR SINGHAnand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent