IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J.
Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and another – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 51323 of 2021
Decided on : 09-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the bail application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of the incident leading to the case. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. investigation process summary. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. arguments from defence counsel. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. state's response and concerns. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. principles for considering bail. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 7. court's analysis of the case. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. legal interpretations and outcome. (Para 35 , 36 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. final decisions and directions of the court. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
ORDER :
INDEX
• Brief Facts
• Submissions on behalf of accused-applicant
• Submissions on behalf of C.B.I.
• Submissions on behalf of informants
• Submissions on behalf of State of U.P.
• Basic principles for considering bail prayer
• Analysis of Case
• Conclusion
• Result
• Observation and Direction
1. By means of this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., applicant-Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. RC-8(S)/2021/SC-III/ND, under Section 306 IPC, PS SC-III/ND, New Delhi lodged by C.B.I, Special Crime-III, New Delhi (earlier registered as Case Crime No. 322 of 2021, under Section 306 IPC at Police Station George-town, District Prayagraj).
Brief Facts
2. The facts that formed the bedrock of the instant bail application moved by accused-applicant Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya are that Mahant Narendra Giri (deceased) was Adyaksh, of “Akhil Bhartiya Akhada Parishad, Mahant/Head of Shri Math “Baghambari Gaddi”, Allahpur, Prayagraj and “Shri Bade/Lete Hanuman Ji Temple”, Prayagraj.
3. On 20.09.2021 at 05:30 PM, Station House Officer, police station-George Town, Prayagraj received an information on his CUG Mobile No. 9454402825 from Mobile No. 7905160834 of Sarvesh Kumar Dwivedi that Mahant Narendra Giri Maharaj has committed suicide in his room by hanging himself inside the Math. Acting on the aforesaid information, he immediately rushed to the place of incident. Meanwhile other senior officers were also informed, who also reached there. The said information was recorded in General Diary No. 51 dated 20.09.2021 of police station-George Town, Prayagraj. On arriving at the place of incident, he found that dead body of Mahant Narendra Giri Maharaj was lying on floor of the room.
Information was also given to field Unit/Crime Branch team. Shri Sunil Kumar, Additional City Magistrate-III, District Prayagraj also reached there for conducting inquest proceeding on cadaver, which commenced at 22:30 hours on 20.09.2021 and completed at 23:45 hours on the same day.
4. A hand written suicide note containing seven pages of Mahant Narendra Giri, which was kept in two open envelops, two mobile phones of the deceased, knife, bloodstained rope, four packets Sulphas (sulphate) and three DVR of CCTV camera installed at the Math etc. were recovered from the spot in the presence of witnesses, officers and forensic team by the Station House Officer, police station-George Town, Prayagraj. After perusing the suicide note, recovery memos (fard) of recovered items were prepared. Finger prints and chance prints of deceased-Mahant Narendra Giri were also taken. Recovered items were sealed at the spot. The site plan was prepared by the police and photography was also done.
5. Mahant Narendra Giri in his suicide note, has categorically held accused Anand Giri, Adhya Prasad Tiwari and Sandeep Tiwari responsible for taking extreme step to end his life. For better appreciation of the facts, the contents of suicide note are being reproduced herein below:-
eSa egar ujsUnz fxjh] eB ck?kEcjh xnnh cMs guqeku eafnj ¼ysVs guqeku th½ orZeku es v/;{k vf[ky Hkkjrh; v[kkMk ifj"kn vius gks'kks gokl ess cxSj fdlh ncko esa ;g i= fy[k jgk gwW tc ls vkuUn fxjh us esjs Åij vlR; feF;k euxढ+r vkjksi yxk;k rc ls eSa ekufld ncko esa th jgk gwa tc Hkh eSa ,dkar es jgrk gwa ej tkus dh bPNk
Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav vs. State of Maharashtra and Another (2007) 1 SCC 242
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan Alias Pappu Yadav and another (2004) 7 SCC 528
M.Ravindran vs. Intelligence Officer
Praveen Pradhan vs. State of Uttranchal and Another (2012) 9 SCC 734
State of Kerala and Others vs. S.Unnikrishnana Nair and Others (2015) 9 SCC 639.
Ude Singh and Others vs. State of Harayana (2019) 17 SCC 301
AI
Anticipatory bail granted in abetment of suicide case: mere workplace harassment without proximate incitement insufficient; parity with co-accused; no mini-trial at bail stage despite ongoing investi....
Abatement of Suicide - Rejection of bail - Each case has to be decided on the basis of its own facts and circumstances. If the accused kept on irritating or annoying the deceased by words, deeds or c....
(1) To constitute an offence of abetment, mens rea is a condition precedent.(2) Abetment of suicide – Without a positive act on part of accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide, necessary re....
powers of the Court while considering bail application as “we are of the opinion that while it is true that Article 21 is of great importance because it enshrines the fundamental right to individual ....
The court denied bail based on the gravity of allegations involving incitement to violence, potential witness tampering, and the need to ensure trial integrity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.