JUDGMENT :

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard Sri Vishwajeet Rai, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kripa Shankar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State authorities and Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel representing the Lucknow Development Authority.

2. By instituting these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-Kripa Shanker Singh has prayed that the opposite party nos. 1 to 4 may be directed for registry of House No. M/213/G, L.D.A. Colony, Kanpur Road Yojna, Lucknow in his favour. Further, the petitioner has also prayed that the registry of the said house may not be done in favour of opposite party no. 7. Although the Senior Superintendent of Police, Lucknow and the Station House Officer, Police Station Ashiyana, District Lucknow have been arrayed as opposite party nos. 5 and 6 respectively, however, no prayer has been made by the petitioner against them.

3. The case set up by the petitioner in the writ petition is that one Smt. Kavita Singh was issued a letter dated 22nd January, 1992 informing her that her application dated 03.01.1992 was accepted by the Lucknow Development Authority for allotment of Plot No. A/86