INDIRA BANERJEE, J. K. MAHESHWARI
Gangadhar Narayan Nayak @ Gangadhar Hiregutti – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Indira Banerjee, J.
Leave granted.
2. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 17th September 2021 passed by the Dharwad Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, dismissing Criminal Petition No.101420/2020 filed by the Appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “the Cr.P.C.”), and upholding an order dated 19th April 2018 passed by the Principal District Judge, Uttar Kannada, Karwar, taking cognizance against the Appellant of offence under Section 23 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “POCSO”).
3. The short question of law involved in this appeal is, whether Section 155(2) of the Cr.P.C. applies to the investigation of an offence under Section 23 of POCSO? Is the Special Court debarred from taking cognizance of an offence under Section 23 of POCSO and obliged to discharge the accused under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C., only because of want of permission of the jurisdictional Magistrate to the police, to investigate into the offence?
4. The Appellant is the Editor of Kar
Keshav Lal Thakur v. State of Bihar
State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar and Others
H. N. Rishbud and Others v. State of Delhi
Nipun Saxena v. Union of India
Santosh Kumar Mandal vs. State
Nathu Ram & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Rajiv Chaudhary vs. State (NCT) of Delhi
Rakesh Kumar Paul vs. State of Assam
Keshav Lal Thakur vs. State of Bihar
Fertico Marketing and Investment Private Limited & Ors. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.