IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MOHD. ASLAM, J.
Mohd.Shakib – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Application U/S 482 No.23143 of 2021
Decided on : 25-08-2022
Cow Slaughter Act - Transportation of Cow and Progeny - Section 5A U.P. Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 - [5A] - The judgment discusses the relevant provisions of the Cow Slaughter Act, particularly Section 5A, and its interpretation by the court. It highlights that no permit is required to transport cow and its progeny within the state of Uttar Pradesh, and the court concludes that the impugned orders confiscating the vehicle are without jurisdiction and against the provisions of the law.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant's vehicle was seized for illegally carrying cow without legal authority. The applicant claimed no knowledge or involvement in the offense and sought release of the vehicle, which was rejected by the District Magistrate and the revisional court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that no permit is required to transport cow and its progeny within the state of Uttar Pradesh, and the impugned orders confiscating the vehicle were without jurisdiction and against the provisions of the law.
Issues: Violation of provisions of law in transporting cow and its progeny, legality of impugned orders confiscating the vehicle.
Ratio Decidendi: No permit is required to transport cow and its progeny within the state of Uttar Pradesh, and the impugned orders confiscating the vehicle are without jurisdiction and against the provisions of the law.
Final Decision: The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed, and the impugned orders are set-aside. The concerned court is directed to release the vehicle in question forthwith, in accordance with the law.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Mani Shanker Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri L.D. Rajbhar, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and perused the record.
2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 18.08.2021 passed by District Magistrate, Varanasi in Case No. 00054 of 2021 (State vs. Mohammad Shakib), under Section 5A U.P. Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, as well as order dated 13.10.2021 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Chandauli in Criminal Revision No. 54 of 2021 (Shakib vs. State of U.P.).
3. Brief facts of the case are that applicant is registered owner of vehicle no.UP-70ET/2667 which is duly registered in the Transport Department, U.P, the photostat copy of registration certificate has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the affidavit. The aforesaid vehicle was insured with Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. for the period of 15.07.2020 to midnight 14.07.2021, photostat copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the affidavit. The aforesaid vehicle was purchased by the applicant with the financial assistance of MAGMA Fincrop Ltd., 11 MG Habibullah Estate, Hazratganj, Lucknow w.e.f. 21.10.2019 which is endorsed in the registration paper of aforesaid vehicle itself. The vehicle is used to run on the road in transport business by the applicant and monthly installment of the financer of Rs.35,000/-is being paid by the applicant. During the course of business on 12.12.2020 the vehicle was caught by the police of police station Sayaidaraja, District Chandauli at about 20:50 P.M. and was seized in favour of government for illegally carrying the transport business of cow without any legal authority and first information report was lodged under Sections 3/5A/8, 5B of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act.
4. As per the first information report, it was informed by the informer that the alleged Truck bearing registration No. UP-70ET/2667 is carrying animals for the purpose of cow slaughtering without valid permission and on that information the concerned police caught the aforesaid vehicle and recovered 16 bullocks, whereas, the driver of the vehicle had ran away. Thereafter, the aforesaid vehicle was taken to police station and first information report was lodged on 12.12.2020 at 22:48 hrs. as Case Crime No. 235 of 2020, under Sections 3/5A/8, 5B Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and seized the aforesaid vehicle in favour of government. The aforesaid vehicle is a heavy vehicle and national permit has also been issued by Transport Department, UP, Allahabad and authorized certificate to national permit is also issued, copies whereof have been annexed as Annexure No.4 to the affidavit. The Pollution Under Control Certificate is also issued by Transport Department, UP, Allahabad till 05.01.2021, copy of the same has been annexed as Annexure No.5 to the affidavit. The aforesaid vehicle is in custody of police authority of Police Station Saiyadraja since 12.12.2020. The concerned police informed the applicant at the time of seizing of the Truck that driver of the Truck had ran away from the spot. Thereafter, applicant produced the driver before the court below who was released on bail by the court below. The applicant was granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 18.03.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1854 of 2021, the copy of the order has been annexed as Annexure No.6 to the affidavit. The applicant had purchased the aforesaid Truck in the year, 2015 and since then there was no complaint regarding carrying of cow or its progeny. Prior two days of the incident, the driver of the aforesaid Truck had gone to carry paddy in district Chandauli without giving information to the applicant, and thereupon, the aforesaid Truck was caught by the police of police station Saiyadraja who informed the applicant about the seizure of Truck. The aforesaid offence
Kailash Yadav and Others vs. State of U.P. & others
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and C.M. Mudaliar vs. State of Gujarat [AIR 2003 SC 638]
No permit is required to transport cow and its progeny within the state of Uttar Pradesh.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that no permit is required for transportation of cows and its progeny within the State of U.P. under Section 5-A of the U.P. Prevention of Cow S....
The U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act does not provide an appeal mechanism for confiscation orders, directing that recourse must be sought through the Divisional Commissioner per the notification ....
The rightful owner of seized property should be allowed to enjoy the property, and the power under Section 451 of the Criminal Procedure Code should be exercised judiciously and promptly.
The court affirmed that special provisions under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, regarding confiscation of vehicles used for illegal transport of beef, take precedence over general pr....
Prompt action under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. is necessary to avoid keeping seized property at police stations for a long time, and seized vehicles should be released when ownership is not disputed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.