KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Mahendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ram Milan Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Vikas Goswami, learned AGA for the State and Sri Vikas Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent informant and perused the record. There is a connected defective criminal appeal which is of the year 2018, preferred by the original informant. This appeal is also heard along with the present appeal.
2. Appeal No. 6058 of 2018 has been preferred by the appellant Mahendra Kumar against the judgment and order dated 25.09.2018 passed by Additional Session Judge/FTC (Crime against Women) Jaunpur, in S.T. No. 306 OF 2015, arising out of Case Crime No. 262 of 2015, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and ¾ D.P. Act (State vs. Mahendra Kumar and another), P.S. Sujanganj, District Jaunpur, whereby the appellant is convicted and sentenced for the commission of offence under Section 498A IPC, for 2 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 5,000/-and in default of payment of fine for two months additional imprisonment to the accussed appellant and further sentincing under Section 304B IPC for 10 years R.I., under section 4 D.P. Act for one year imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,000/-and in default of payment of fine one month additional im
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani vs. State Of Kerala & Anr
Chandrappa Vs. State Of Karnataka
Luna Ram vs. Bhupat Singh And Ors.
Mookkiah And Anr. vs. State, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police, Tamil Nadu
State of Rajasthan vs. Sohan Lal and Others
State Of Karnataka vs. Hemareddy
Girija Nandini Devi v. Bigendra Nandini Choudhary
State Of Punjab vs. Madan Mohan Lal Verma
Jayaswamy vs. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.