Back
RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Committee of Management, Pandit Nehru Madhyamik Vidyalaya, through its Manager – Respondent
ORDER :
On Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 1 of 2022
1. There is a delay of 50 days in filing this appeal.
2. Heard learned Counsel for parties.
3. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application. Cause shown is sufficient. Delaying in filing the appeal is condoned.
4. The application is allowed.
On Appeal
5. The State of U.P. through the Secretary, Basic Education and three other officers of the Department of Basic Education have preferred this appeal from the judgment and order dated 30.05.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ -A No. 18523 of 2021.
6. By the judgment and order impugned, the writ petition preferred by respondent no. 2 (for short, 'the writ petitioner') has been allowed. The learned Judge quashed the order dated 22.10.2021 passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Auraiya, declining various remunerative entitlements of the writ petitioner, an Assistant Teacher with an aided and recognized institution. The learned Single Judge has further issued a mandamus, ordering the appellants here, respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 to the writ petition, to ensure payment to the writ petitioner of his bonus, increment from 22.12.1997, s
The court held that interruptions in the respondent's service were caused by deliberate and mala fide actions of the institution and the State authorities were also held responsible for not preventin....
The appointment under Dying-in-Harness Rules was substantive and could not be terminated without due process. Mere implication in false and illegal proceedings not resulting in any punishment cannot ....
Post-retirement withdrawal of appointment approval is illegal; retiral benefits are entitled to timely payment with interest on delays.
The court emphasized the importance of timely approach to the court for relief and considered the interpretation of relevant government orders in determining the eligibility for pay protection.
The delay in approaching the court does not affect the claim for pay protection and higher pension, and the recurring cause of action in matters of pay scale and consequential pension justifies the r....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
