Puspha Devi W/o Shri Jai Karan Singh vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 1126

SHAMIM AHMED
Puspha Devi W/o Shri Jai Karan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Suresh Kumar Yadav.

JUDGMENT :

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

1. Pleadings have already been exchanged between the parties are on the record.

2. Heard Shri Suresh Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

3. The applicant, Puspha Devi, has moved the present bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No. 327 of 2018, under Sections 302, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station Mohammadpur Khala, District Barabanki.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that accused applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant was not named in the F.I.R. and she was summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. on the premise of statements of witnesses, PW-7, PW-9 and PW-10 in the trial court who have maliciously taken the name of applicant with intention to implicate the applicant falsely. The complainant in her statement before the trial court has not taken the name of applicant. As per prosecution case, the main role has been assigned to co-accused Gajraj Singh, who has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.04.2019 passed in Bail No. 8940 of 2018. One another co-accused, Jaikaran Singh @ C