RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
Vinay Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Dr. L.P. Misra, assisted by Sri Nadeem Murtaza, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jaideep Narain Mathur, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri S.N. Tilhari, learned counsel for the State and Sri I.B. Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Ashmita Singh, learned counsel for the complainant/opposite party no.5.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:-
(ii) to issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondents not to proceed, prosecute, or arrest the Petitioner on the basis of the impugned FIR registered against the Petitioner by Respondent no.5 as FIR/Case Crime No.0310/2022, under section 342, 386, 504 and 506 IPC, and 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Police Stat
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
Yashwant Sinha and Others v. Central Bureau of Investigation through its Director and Another
Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P.
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
Hema Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh
H.H.B. Gill and another v. The King
Smt. Neera Yadav vs. C.B.I. (Bharat Sangh)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.