AJIT KUMAR
Kamal Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ajit Kumar, J.)
1. Heard Sri T.A. Khan, learned Advocate appearing for the revision applicant in S.C.C. Revision Nos. 215 of 2014 and 245 of 2014 and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Akanksha Sharma, learned counsel for the revision applicant in S.C.C. Revision No. 246 of 2014.
2. All these three revisions arise out of suit proceedings of S.C.C. Case No. 11 of 2011. The S.C.C. Revision No. 215 of 2014 have been filed by Kamal Kumar Gupta, tenant of plaintiff/ respondent Ajay Kumar Gupta challenging the order passed by Judge, Small Causes dated 02.04.2014 rejecting the miscellaneous application filed by the petitioner bearing paper no. 41, whereby, he had sought further time to permit him to deposit the remaining amount as per order passed on 27.02.2014 maintaining application under Order IX Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter to be referred as 'CPC') and allowing the same by the order.
3. The S.C.C. Revision No. 245 of 2014 has been filed again by Kamal Kumar Gupta, the tenant challenging the order dated 06.03.2014 rejecting the miscellaneous application no. 2 of 2013, whereby, he had prayed for extension of time granted earlier
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.