Back
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, JAYANT BANERJI
Ganga Charan Aryawardhan Hospital – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Counsel for the parties are agreeable that the matter be heard and decided at this stage itself without calling for affidavits from respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition is being taken up for consideration.
2. Heard Shri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Udayan Nandan and Shri Ashok Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri D.S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. The State-respondents, namely, respondent no. 1 and 4 are represented by learned Standing Counsel.
BACKGROUND:
3. In the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge an order dated 17.10.2022 passed by the Vice-Chairman of Bareilly Development Authority[BDA] rejecting the proposal for compounding of the nursing home of the petitioner. Further under challenge are the orders/letters both dated 22.10.2022 informing the petitioner, respectively, that as per the approved layout, on a residential plot, a nursing home cannot be sanctioned, therefore, the proposal for compounding of the nursing home has been rejected by t
Unauthorized use of a building for a nursing home without permission violates urban planning laws and may result in rejection of compounding proposals.
Accrued rights from previous land use approvals must be respected despite new regulations; Town Planner's jurisdiction to deny building plan approval was not established.
The court noted that unauthorized construction may be regularized under existing rules if deviations are minor, requiring proper procedures for addressing complaints.
Public landowner has preferential redevelopment rights on reserved slum land; conditional NOC cancellation valid for developer's failure to provide compliant plans for public amenities, subordinating....
The court upheld the government's authority to change land use from hospital to IT services, affirming that the original allotment was valid and notifications were legally issued.
Point of law: writ petition was not barred by either on the principles of res judicata or constructive res judicata. In the peculiar facts of the case since the issues referred to supra namely issue ....
The court emphasized that the DDA's attempt to redefine terms and refuse to execute the lease deed after multiple court directives and payment of charges amounted to an abuse of process of law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
