SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1198

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Zuhair Bin Saghir – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Asit Srivastava, Akhilesh Kumar Kalra.

JUDGMENT :

(C.M. Application No. 1 of 2022)

1. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner, learned State Counsel and having gone through the averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay, we find that the delay in filing this Special Appeal has sufficiently been explained.

2. Accordingly, application is allowed and the delay in preferring the Special Appeal is hereby condoned.

(Order on memo of Appeal)

3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner and learned counsel representing the State-respondents.

4. We have also perused the record available on this Special Appeal.

5. By instituting the proceedings of this intra-court appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court, the appellant-petitioner has questioned the order dated 18.05.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Appeal No. 2894 of 2022, whereby the said writ petition has been dismissed.

6. At this juncture itself, we may note that by instituting Writ Appeal No. 2894 of 2022, the appellant-petitioner had challenged the validity of the order dated 16.03.2022, passed by the State Government in the Vigilance Department whereby the representation made by the appellant-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top