IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
Radha Mohan Rai - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 583 of 1982
Decided On : 17-11-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 141, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 325 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 313 – Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 134 – First information report – Unlawful assembly – Punishment for rioting – Attempt to murder – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt – Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt – Appeal is preferred against judgment and order passed by Vth Additional Sessions Judge, in Session Trial, convicting and sentencing appellant under Section 323 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code and Section 147 of Indian Penal Code on probation for two years while suspending sentence – Held, Accused persons were known to complainant-informant and other injured persons and there are chances that accused person could have been identified by their appearance and voice – It is also to be noted that physical assault is taking place for long time and voice of accused person was heard and further there was source of light at place of occurrence which was proved by prosecution – Physical assault by Appellant on injured witnesses including the informant has also been proved by prosecution by testimony of P.W.1 and P.W.2 who are eyewitness of the alleged incident – Accused person including appellant came along with five-six persons with common object of committing crime/offence and as such trial court has committed no illegality in convicting appellant by impugned judgement – Considering overall circumstances and submission of learned counsel for appellant, learned A.G.A. for State and after going through evidence and lower court record, Court are unable to persuade ourselves in taking a different opinion from that of trial court – Trial court was fully justified in convicting accused-respondent – Learned counsel for appellant failed to point out any illegality, infirmity or perversity in judgment of trial court – Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. The present appeal is preferred against judgment and order dated 18.12.1981 passed by Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Session Trial No.64 of 1981, convicting and sentencing the appellant-Radha Mohan Rai under Section 323 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code on probation for two years while suspending the sentence.
2. The present appeal has been filed by two Appellant's, namely, Radha Mohan Rai (Appellant no.1) and Ram Kripal (Appellant no.2). During the pendency of the appeal, Ram Kripal (Appellant no.2) has died and the present appeal is abated in respect of Appellant no.2 by order dated 01.02.2010.
3. The prosecution case as per the first information report is to the effect that Madan Rai-informant had enmity with Ram Chhabila Rai regarding taking meals together. Radha Mohan is relative of Ram Chabila. About one month prior to the incident, Ram Chabila Rai wanted some passage to his house through the courtyard of the informant and the informant had promised Ram Chabila Rai for passage from the eastern corner of his house but Ram Chabila Rai did not accept the same. There was a panchayat in respect of the aforesaid dispute where the informant promised Ram Chabila Rai to give him passage through the border. Radha Mohan became annoyed and in the panchayat threatened the informant by throttling his neck and stating that he will take passage after finishing the informant. The other persons present in the panchayat intervened.
4. On 27.05.1980, informant together with his cousin Virendra Rai and uncle Munni Rai were sleeping at his tubewell in Village-Mansurpur. Three accused persons together with five-six other persons came there being armed with lathi and country made pistol. There was no electricity at the tubewell but the lantern was burning. The informant was lying awaken. The accused-appellant Radha Mohan shouted what is the delay we have got all three together kill them. On the aforesaid call, all the accused persons started beating the complainant, his uncle and cousin. As a result of the same, the uncle of the complainant and cousin was badly injured. The accused persons could be recognised in the moonlight and in the light of the lantern. The other persons could be recognised after seeing them. On his alarm, some persons of the nearby vicinity arrived there and thereafter, the accused persons left thinking that the injured have died. The family members took the three injured persons to the hospital on the same night. The uncle of the complainant and the cousin were in serious condition in the hospital and after getting himself medically examined, the complainant came to the police station to lodge the first information report. The first information report was lodged on 28.05.1980 at 8:20 AM at police Station Phephna, which is 6 miles away from the place of occurrence.
5. On the basis of the aforesaid first information report, a case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 I.P.C. was lodged at Police Station Phephna being Case Crime No.126 of 1980.
6. The injured persons were medically examined by Dr. Arun Kumar on 28th May, 1980 am at District Hospital, Ballia.
7. After completion of investigation, Investigating Officer has submitted chargesheet against the accused persons and charges were framed on 19th September, 1981 against the accused persons under Sections 307/149/147, 323, 149, 325/149 I.P.C.
8. All the accused persons have denied the charges levelled against them and have claimed to be tried. In support of prosecution case seven witnesses were examined.
9. P.W.1-Madan Rai has stated that he has a residential house having an area of 3-4 kita and appurtenant land. He has further stated that he has a tubewell which is three furlong from his house and tubewell is on the agricultural land. He has further stated that Munni Rai is his uncle and Virendra Rai is his cousin brother. He has stated that his uncle Munni Rai is living with him and cousin Virendra also
The court confirmed that related eyewitnesses can provide reliable testimony in murder cases when corroborated by medical evidence, emphasizing that evidence must be assessed for credibility rather t....
The need for consistency and credibility in evaluating evidence in criminal cases, and the requirement to prove common intention under S.149 IPC.
The court affirmed the conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC, emphasizing the credibility of eyewitnesses and the common object of the accused in a fatal assault.
The court established that eyewitness testimonies can be reliable even if related to the victims, especially when corroborated by medical evidence, addressing distinctions in criminal liability under....
Conviction for mass murder under 302/149 IPC set aside due to unreliable, contradictory ocular evidence from related witnesses; doubtful night identification, improbable presence/story; benefit of do....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.