JYOTSNA SHARMA
Girish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Mukul Yadav, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This revision has been filed challenging the order dated 11.01.2022 passed by the Child Welfare Committee, Kasganj and further challenging the order dated 26.10.2022 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in Criminal Appeal No.7 of 2022 in a matter arising out of Case Crime No.140 of 2022, under sections-363, 366, 376 I.P.C., Police Station-Sunngarh, District- Kasganj.
3. The relevant facts giving rise to this revision are as below :-
An F.I.R. was lodged by father of the victim alleging abduction of his daughter; the victim was recovered and was directed to be produced before the Child Welfare Committee; the Child Welfare Committee passed an order dated 11.01.2022 simultaneously rejecting four applications, one moved on behalf of mother of the victim and second moved on behalf of the married sister of the victim namely Islanti and two applications moved by the victim herself. The facts and circumstances of the case as put before the Child Welfare Committee indicated that the victim became pregnant with the child of her jeeja Om Pal, husband of her real sister Islanti. It may
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.