JYOTSNA SHARMA
Ram Lakhan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sri Rahul Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Narendra Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Order on Criminal Misc. Amendment Application No. 5 of 2024
An amendment application has been filed on behalf of the revisionist seeking amendment in the prayer clause.
The amendment application is allowed.
Let necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day.
Order on Criminal Revision
1. This criminal revision by revisionist Ram Lakhan has been filed against O.P. No. 2 Sangeeta Devi and four others challenging the order dated 26.03.2022 by which the victim was directed to be kept in a child care institution and further the order dated 10.05.2022, by which the application for obtaining custody of the victim was rejected by C.W.C. By means of this revision a further prayer has been made by the revisionist to set aside the order dated 26.08.2022 passed by lower appellate court in Criminal appeal no. 32 of 2022 (Ram Lakhan Vs. State of U.P. and others) arising out of case crime no. 05 of 2022, under sections 363, 366, 376(3) I.P.C. and section ¾ of POCSO Act, by which the appeal filed challenging the or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.