Shoib Ahmad vs State of U. P. - 2022 Supreme(All) 1325

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 1325

MAYANK KUMAR JAIN
Shoib Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ram Bahadur, Manoj Kumar Srivastava, Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent: Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, Amrendra Kumar Mishra

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Anil Srivastava, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Prem Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Shri Amrendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and Shri Om Prakash Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 23.08.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court-I, Bhadohi on the application under section 319 Cr.P.C. moved by the informant in Sessions Trial No. 281 of 2021 arising out of Case Crime No. 135 of 2021, under sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, police station Bhadohi, district Bhadohi, whereby the learned trial court has summoned the revisionist under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face the trial with other accused.

3. Brief facts of the case as narrated in the first information report are that the informant Akhlaq Ahmad lodged a report at the police station concerned with the averment that he performed the marriage of his daughter Dilkusha Bano with Ashfaq Ahmad on 25th March 2021 according to Muslim rituals. After one week of the marriage, the in-laws started harassing