IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JJ.
Deepak and Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1005 of 2013
Decided On : 20-10-2022
Dying Declaration - Criminal Appeal - Section 302 I.P.C., Section 34 I.P.C., Section 354 IPC, Section 452 IPC, Section 3(2)(v) The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - [302 I.P.C., 34 I.P.C., 354 IPC, 452 IPC, 3(2)(v) The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act] - The court discussed the reliability of the dying declaration, the testimony of hostile witnesses, and the applicability of the SC/ST Act. The court found the dying declaration to be reliable and convicted the accused based on it. The court also found the offence to be punishable under Section 304 (Part-I) IPC.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased was set ablaze by the accused appellants and died after 17 days due to septicaemia.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the dying declaration to be reliable and convicted the accused based on it. The court also found the offence to be punishable under Section 304 (Part-I) IPC.
Issues: Reliability of the dying declaration, applicability of the SC/ST Act, and the nature of the offence.
Ratio Decidendi: The dying declaration was found to be reliable and formed the basis for conviction. The court also found the offence to be punishable under Section 304 (Part-I) IPC.
Final Decision: The appeal was partly allowed, and the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 / 34 IPC was converted into conviction under Section 304 (Part-I) IPC. The appellants were sentenced to undergo ten years of incarceration with remission.
JUDGMENT :
Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. The instant Criminal Appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 2.3.2013 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) / Additional Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad in Sessions Trial No. 402 of 2008 (Case Crime No. 230 of 2007), P.S. Babugarh, District Ghaziabad convicting and sentencing the appellants under Section 302 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. for life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- each with stipulation of default clause, under Section 354 IPC for one year rigorous imprisonment, under Section 452 IPC for two years rigorous imprisonment and under Section 3 (2)(v) The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (in short ''the SC/ST Act') for life imprisonment each and a fine of Rs.5,000/- with stipulation of default clause.
2. Brief facts, as culled out from the record, are that a First Information Report was lodged by the informant, Sukhpal son of Ram Chandra, resident of village Garhi Hoshiyarpur, Police Station Babugarh, Ghaziabad, at Police Station Babugarh, District Ghaziabad with the averments that on 16.7.2007 at 11.30 a.m. when her niece Km. Laxmi, daughter of Kripal (Julaha), was present in the house, Pintu and Deepak sons of Satpal @ Sattu entered in the house and asked her as to why outstanding rent of Rs.100/- for the video C.D. was not paid by her. Pintu inquired that many days ago he had given a letter to her and why she had not given answer? To this, niece of the informant objected and started scolding them. This angered the accused. Deepak brought the canister containing kerosene oil, opened the lid and poured upon the niece of informant at once and Pintu set her ablaze. On her shrieks, informant and other persons reached there and they both ran away. She was severely burnt and sent to Hapur for treatment.
3. On 19.7.2007, dying declaration of the victim (Ext. ka-9) was recorded by the Tehsildar. He also took her signature over the same. Victim was conscious at the time of statement.
4. On the basis of the written report (Ext. ka-1), chik First Information Report (Ext. Ka-5) was registered at Police Station concerned on 16.7.2007 at 12.35 p.m. against the accused appellants as case crime no. 230 of 2007. G.D. entry was also registered at the same time.
5. The F.I.R. was investigated by the Sub-Inspector of the concerned Police Station and subsequently it was investigated by the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station. During course of investigation, the Investigating Officer recorded the statement of witnesses and victim, prepared site plan, inquest report was prepared and post mortem was performed. The investigation was over and after completing all formalities, charge sheet was submitted against the accused appellants. The learned Magistrate summoned the accused and committed the case to Court of Sessions, as prima facie charges were for the sessions triable offences.
6. The Court of Sessions framed the charges as accused were summoned in commission of the offence under Sections 452, 354, 302/34, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act. The accused pleaded not guilty and wanted to be tried. Trial started and in support of its case, prosecution examined 14 witnesses, who are as follows :
| 1. | Kripal | PW-1 (father of the deceased) |
| 2. | Sukhpal | PW-2 (informant) (uncle of deceased) |
| 3. | Mithlesh | PW-3 |
| 4. | Savitri | PW-4 (aunt of deceased) |
| 5. | Kamlesh | PW-5 |
| 6. | Raju @ Raj Kumar | PW-6 |
| 7. | Ummed Singh | PW-7 |
| 8. | Rumal Singh | PW-8 |
| 9. | Indrajeet | PW-9 (witness of recovery) |
| 10. | Praveen Kumar Tyagi | PW-10 (Investigating Officer-II) |
| 11. | H.C.P. Rampal Singh | PW-11 (scribe of the F.I.R.) |
| 12. | S.I. Bijendra Singh | PW-12 (Investigating Officer-I) |
| 13. | Harish Chandra Pandey | PW-13 (Technical Assistant posted in G.T.B. Hospital, Delhi, who pr |
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on dying declaration as a sole basis for conviction under Section 302/34 of IPC, the interpretation of Section 498A of IPC, and the ap....
The dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it is true, reliable, and recorded in accordance with law. The cause of death due to septicaemia led to the classification of the offence....
Point of Law : Hostility of witnesses of fact cannot demolish the value and reliability of the dying declaration of the deceased, which has been proved by prosecution in accordance with law and is a ....
It is quite clear that if dying declaration dying declaration is absolutely credible and nothing is brought on record that deceased was in such a condition, he or she could not have made a dying decl....
The reliability of dying declaration, the role of hostile witnesses, and the distinction between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder in cases of death due to septicemia.
The dying declaration was the sole basis for conviction, and the distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Section 299 and 300 of the Indian Penal Code was cr....
The reliability of dying declarations and the application of the fourth exception to Section 300 of IPC in cases of sudden quarrel and heat of passion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.