SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
Yogendra Singh Yadav - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Writ - A No. 6422 of 2021
Decided On : 20-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Pratik Chandra, Sr. Advocate Sri Ashok Khare.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Purnendu Kumar Singh.

Headnote:

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Section 409, 420, 120-B, 13 – Criminal misconduct by a public servant – Rural Electrification Scheme – Petition has been filed by petitioner challenging order Respondent No. 2 and also consequential order Respondent with a further prayer that respondents be directed not to interfere in working of petitioner as Assistant Engineer Banda Rural District-Banda and not to adopt Sealed Cover Procedure in respect of promotion of petitioner as Assistant Engineer in Department – Held, Court observed that it is only when Charge Memo is issued in disciplinary proceedings or a Charge Sheet is filed in a Criminal Court it could be said that disciplinary proceedings criminal proceedings are pending against employee concerned – Pendency of preliminary investigation prior to that stage will not be sufficient to enable authority to adopt Sealed Cover Procedure – Supreme Court in the case of either employee concerned should be suspended – Charge Sheet in disciplinary proceedings should have been issued charge sheet in Criminal Case should have been filed before competent trial court before Sealed Cover Procedure could have been adopted – Writ Petition stands allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Pratik Chandra and Sri Purnendu Kumar Singh, learned counsel Singh appearing for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.

2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 04.02.2021 passed by the Respondent No. 2 and also the consequential order dated 27.02.2021 passed by the Respondent No. 2 with a further prayer that the respondents be directed not to interfere in the working of the petitioner as Assistant Engineer (Electricity Distribution Sub Division) Banda Rural, District-Banda and not to adopt Sealed Cover Procedure in respect of promotion of the petitioner as Assistant Engineer in the Department.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as a Junior Engineer initially on Ad hoc basis in 2007, and thereafter, confirmed on the post in question and was transferred from place to place. Lastly he was working in the office of the Executive Engineer Electricity Distribution Division, Kanpur Dehat. A dispute arose with regard to implementation of Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojna 2005-2006 and the petitioner was directed by the Superintending Engineer to appear before the Inspector in-charge of Vigilance Inquiry, Sri Ajit Kumar on 29.11.2018 at Jhansi to get his statement recorded. The petitioner then came to know that a First Information Report was lodged under section 409, 420, 120-B and Section 13 (1)(C), 13(1)(D), 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at PS-Navabagh, District Jhansi on 05.07.2019 against 9 persons including the petitioner in respect of irregularities pertaining to implementation of Rajiv Gandhi Rural Electrification Scheme as aforesaid. While the investigation was pending, proceedings for promotion were undertaken by the department and eligibility list was issued, the petitioner's name was included in the said eligibility list. A direction was issued by the Headquarter to provide information about pendency of any disciplinary/criminal proceedings or issuance of charge sheet if any in either of such proceedings against the officers whose name were mentioned in the eligibility list. No information was sent in so far as the petitioner was concerned. The petitioner was considered by the DPC and his name appeared in the list of selected candidates for the post of Assistant Engineer under the 40% promotion quota as evident from the order issued by the Managing Director, UPPCL on 26.10.2019. The petitioner joined as Assistant Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Jhinjak, Kanpur Dehat on 30.10.2019, and thereafter was directed to join the office of the Chief Engineer, Electricity Distribution Zone, Banda. The petitioner was also sent for training on 17.01.2020, and he completed his training and was directed to join at Electricity Distribution Division, Karvi-2, District Chitrakoot. The petitioner joined as Sub Divisional Officer, EDD Sub Division, Karvi-2, District Chitrakoot and was later on transferred to Electricity Distribution Sub Division, Banda Rural where he joined on 23.08.2020. The Respondent No. 2 has proceeded to pass an impugned order dated 04.02.2021 cancelling his earlier order of promotion dated 26.10.2019 and has further directed that the case of the petitioner shall be deemed to have been put under sealed cover as per the provisions of the Government Order dated 28.05.1997. Consequent to this order the petitioner has been reverted to his substantive post of Junior Engineer and the Respondent No.3 the Accounts Officer, UP Power Corporation Limited has further directed for payment of salary of the post of Junior Engineer to the petitioner, the salary that the petitioner was getting before his promotion The petitioner has joined in pursuance of the impugned order and is getting salary of Junior Engineer.

4. It has been argued by the learner Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the impugned order has been passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top