MANOJ MISRA, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Atts Associates – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. We have heard Sri Udit Chandra for the petitioner and Sri Puneet Agarwal for the respondents 1 to 5.
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to paragraph no.1 of the writ petition to indicate that first petition on the present cause of action was withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition therefore, the second petition is maintainable. It be observed that the first petition i.e. Writ C No. 34659 of 2021 was pending when this second petition was filed, however, by the time this second petition was filed, an application had already been filed to withdraw the previous petition and this fact was disclosed in this petition. In these circumstances, we deem it appropriate to address this petition on merit as any view to the contrary may render the petitioner remediless.
3. The relevant facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner is a firm engaged in the business of transportation of petroleum products. On an invite by Bharat Petroleu
Gorkha Security Services v. Government (NCT of Delhi)
Radha Krishan Industries v. State of H.P.
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks
UMC Technologies Private Limited v. Food Corporation of India and another
The main legal point established is that a valid show cause notice for imposing the penalty of blacklisting the entire fleet of TTs must clearly inform the noticee about the possibility of such penal....
The corporation's decision to blacklist the entire fleet upon finding a duplicate dip rod in one truck was justified as per the transport discipline guidelines, emphasizing strict liability for viola....
The necessity of issuing a show cause notice before passing an order of blacklisting, specifying the grounds and proposed action in the notice to provide the noticee with an adequate opportunity to r....
The procedural fairness and reasonableness of the actions cannot be called into question as due opportunity was given to the Petitioner.
Blacklisting of a contractor's vehicles must be proportionate to the offense; lifetime blacklisting is impermissible and must be limited to a reasonable period.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a clear mention of the proposed blacklisting action in the show cause notice, as well as the need to adhere to principles of na....
Administrative decisions must be reasoned and justified; failure to provide such reasoning can lead to judicial intervention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.