IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Surepalli Nanda, J.
M/s Radhika Logistics – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.7144 OF 2023
Decided On : 03-06-2024
Transport - Writ of Mandamus - Oil Industry Transport Discipline Guidelines - Sections 8.2.1.k, 8.2.2.11 - The court found the termination of the contract and penalties imposed on the petitioner to be arbitrary and lacking justification, emphasizing the need for reasoned decisions in administrative actions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a transport firm, challenged the termination of its contract and penalties imposed for alleged violations of the Oil Industry Transport Discipline Guidelines, claiming the actions were arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice.
Finding of the Court:
The court determined that the order terminating the contract and imposing penalties was unreasoned and disproportionate, lacking justification for the severe penalties against the petitioner, especially when only one truck was involved.
Issues: Whether the termination of the contract and penalties imposed on the petitioner were justified and in accordance with the Oil Industry Transport Discipline Guidelines.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that administrative orders must be reasoned and justified, and the absence of such reasoning in the impugned order warranted judicial intervention.
Result: The writ petition is allowed, and the impugned order is set aside, directing a fresh examination of the case.
ORDER :
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Heard learned counsel Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Sri Dominic Fernandes appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and 3.
2. The petitioner approached the court seeking the prayer as under:
3. PERUSED THE RECORD :
A) The relevant portion of the order impugned dated 28.02.2023 issued by the 3rd Respondent bearing Ref. No. TAPSO OPS/POL/VGA TML/ITDG/ 22-22/06, reads as under :
| S.No. | ITDG Clause No. | Type of malpractice/Irregularity | Penalty |
| 3. | 8.2.1.k | Tampering with standard fittings of TT including the sealing, security locks, security locking system, calibration, Vehicle Mounted Unit or its fittings/fixures. | TT shall be blacklisted as per Clause No.8.2.2.11 |
| 5. | 8.2.1.r | Any act of the carrier/carrier’s representative that may be harmful to the good name/image of the Oil Company, its products or its services. | As decided by the Company as per Clause No.8.2.2.16 |
Quote
"In the following irregularities, the complicity of the carrier shall be deemed to be existent and the whole contract comprising of all the TTs belonging to the concerned carrier shall be terminated, security deposit forfeited and the concerned carrier & their all TTs shall be blacklisted on Industry basis:
1. False/hidden compartment, unauthorized fittings or alteration in standard fittings affecting Quality and Quantity.
2. Illegal/un-authorized duplicate keys of security locks.
3. Duplicate dip rod/calibration chart."
Unquote
Wherefore after considering your show cause reply, submissions made during the personal hearing and reasons stated above, the competent authority has taken a decision that you have been found guilty in altering with the standard fitting of the TT by introducing non- standard rod inside the dip pipe of M2 compartment for removing the product and ensuring that dip level remains same of short delivery of the product and following actions to be taken against the transporter as per transport agreement and ITDG:
1) Termination of Contract along with forfeiture of Security Deposit of Rs.8,00,000/-
2) Blacklisting of transporter M/s Radhika Logistics and its entire fleet alongwith the crew engaged at Vijayawada terminal for two years on industry basis.
3) Recovery of the total loss of Rs. 67,41,670.38 (Rupees Sixty-Seven lakhs Forty-One Thousand Six Hundred Seventy only) accounted from the date of last calibration.
This letter is issued without prejudice to any of the Corporation's rights and remedies against the transporter.
B. Counter affidavit has been filed by Respondent No.2 and 3, and in particular, Paras 12, 15 and 16 read as follows :
B.C.Chaturvedi v. Union of India
Lucknow Kshetriya Gramin Bank (Now Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank) v. Rajendra Singh
Administrative decisions must be reasoned and justified; failure to provide such reasoning can lead to judicial intervention.
The corporation's decision to blacklist the entire fleet upon finding a duplicate dip rod in one truck was justified as per the transport discipline guidelines, emphasizing strict liability for viola....
The admission of tampering with locks justified the blacklisting and imposition of damages, and comparisons with other cases did not support the appellant's claim of discrimination.
The main legal point established is that a valid show cause notice for imposing the penalty of blacklisting the entire fleet of TTs must clearly inform the noticee about the possibility of such penal....
The procedural fairness and reasonableness of the actions cannot be called into question as due opportunity was given to the Petitioner.
The court upheld the termination of the dealership agreement based on the critical irregularities as per the Marketing Discipline Guidelines.
Blacklisting of a contractor's vehicles must be proportionate to the offense; lifetime blacklisting is impermissible and must be limited to a reasonable period.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.