SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1583

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, SAURABH LAVANIA
Vaibhav Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sharad Pathak, Piyush Pathak, Amrendra Singh, Ashutosh Bajpai, Vijay Shankar Singh, Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi, Rama Kant Dixit, Kshemendra Shukla, Shobhit Mohan Shukla, Anand Mani Tripathi, Atul Benjamin Solomon, Ganesh Nath Mishra, Ashutosh Shahi, Chandra Prakash, Ashok Kumar, Akhilesh Kumar Kalra, Lakshmi Kant Tripathi, Alok Singh Chauhan, Rahul Srivastava, Jai Prakash Yadav, Hari Shanker Tewari, Sharad Nandan Ojha, Akhand Pratap Singh, Eshan Garg, Somdutta Singh, Ranjana Srivastava, Bal Keshwar Srivastava, Shraddha Tripathi, Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Niteesh Kumar, J.B. Singh, R.K.S. Chauhan, Jagdambika Prasad Tripathi, Jagdish Prasad Maurya, Sandeep Kumar, Dr. Ravi Kumar Mishra, Akash Mishra, Pawan Kumar Upadhyay, Rakesh Devi Prasad Kumar, Smt. Pramila D. Misra, Sushil Kumar Pathak, Prashant Kumar Singh, Ashutosh Srivastava, Devesh Chandra Pathak, Mohammad Asmar Ansari, Gibran Akhtar Khan, Mohd. Jafar Alam, Harish Chandra Yadav, Anand Dubey, Anil Kumar Nishad, Jagroopan Nishad, Ramesh Kumar, Raj Kumar Singh, O.P. Tiwari, Mohd. Ateeq Khan, Akash Deep Dubey, Anupam Shukla, Virendra Kumar Dubey, Abhinav Singh, Shashank Singh, Vinod Kumar, Dev Mani Mishra, Virendra Mishra, Manish Misra, Gaurav Upadhyay, Anuj Kumar Garg, Ram Mohan Mishra, Tushar Mittal, Gaurav Mehrotra, Anurag Shukla, Neeraj Kumar Mishra, Rajesh Kumar Shukla, Preeti Shukla (Tiwari), Satya Prakash Mishra, Babu Ram Shukla, Sarfraz Ahmad, Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya), Kanchan Kumar Pandey, Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava, Prashant Kumar Srivastava, Kalika Prasad Pandey, Subhash Chandra Ojha, Udai Bhanu Singh, Virendra Singh, Nitin Kumar Mishra, Lavlesh Kumar, Brijesh Kumar Kuldeep, Ravi Kumar Verma, Rachit Gupta, Sushil Yadav, Manuvendra Singh, Sachin Pratap Singh, Ravindra Kumar Singh, Sudhir Kumar Dhangar, Om Prakash Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Sarvesh Kumar Misra, Arvind Kumar, Gayatri Abhyasi, Pankaj Kumar Sahu, Jaikaran, Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Kirti Veer Singh, Pankaj Prasoon, Ravi Shanker Singh, Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi, Akram Azad, Ausaf Ahmad Khan, Abhishek Singh, Akhand Kumar Pandey, Rajeev Kr. Chauhan, Sachida Nand Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Azad Khan, Ankush Pandey, Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Vivek Kumar Singh, Pranav Pandey, Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Nitin Kumar Mishra, Rajendra Prasad Lodhi for the Petitioner; C.S.C., Anurag Kumar Singh, Rohit Tripathi, Atul Kumar Dubey, Namit Sharma, Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Shantanu Gupta, Satish Chandra Kashish, Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Akash Sinha, Dharmendra Gupta, Aakash Singh, Ram Kumar Singh, Hemant Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Gupta, Banwari Lal Maurya

JUDGMENT :

Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J.

Prologue

1.1 It is inclusion not exclusion, equality not inequality and democracy not executive fiat that runs as a common thread throughout our Constitution. In a society as diverse as ours it has been the endeavour of our Constitutional Courts to further strengthen this thread.

With this percept in mind, we proceed to consider the issues posed before us in this batch of petitions which raise similar questions of fact and law and hence are being decided by this common judgment which follows:

1.2 Some of these petitions have been filed as Public Interest Litigation and some of them raise the alleged personal grievance arising out of a notification dated 5.12.2022 issued by the State Government in the Department of Urban Development which is a draft order in terms of Section 9-A (5)(3) of Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 (hereinafter referred to as 'Municipalities Act') inviting objections to the proposed determination of number of offices of the Chairpersons of different Municipal Bodies to be reserved for the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes and Women. Challenge, however, is confined to the proposed determination for

                                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                            1
                                            2
                                            3
                                            4
                                            5
                                            6
                                            7
                                            8
                                            9
                                            10
                                            11
                                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                            supreme today icon
                                            logo-black

                                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                            Please visit our Training & Support
                                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                            qr

                                            Scan Me!

                                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                            whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                                            whatsapp-icon Back to top